Three small designers have levied a lawsuit against Shein, alleging that the fast fashion brand uses an algorithm to identify trends, then sells exact copies of designs. They also claim that Shein has a purposefully complex organizational structure to avoid legal accountability.
This is not the first time Shein has been sued by designers for allegedly stealing designs, and the controversy with the brand doesn’t stop there. Shein also exploits textile factory workers with unsafe working conditions and pitifully low wages. The business has also come under rightful criticism for its production practices which are environmentally detrimental. The fashion industry creates 92 million tons of textiles that end up in landfills every year, and fashion produces 10 percent of global emissions — “more than all international flights and maritime shipping combined,” according to one report.
Consumers point to the fact that these affordable prices give them access to a wide variety of fashions. Some plus-size consumers also argue that the selection for them in traditional fashion lines is limited, and fast fashion provides a useful and affordable alternative. They accuse sustainable fashion companies of being elitists with very few plus-size options. These are valid claims as we witness the soaring cost of living with recent increases in inflation. But do the needs of some of these consumers outweigh the reality of the detrimental effects of fast fashion?
To bridge this gap, we need to first acknowledge that the responsibility for Shein’s labor exploitation and environmental harm is not on the individual consumer. The fashion industry has created a culture obsessed with trends and impulse buying for its own profits. This then produces demand as it becomes a social norm to buy something new after a bad day, indulge in a shopping spree, or buy a new outfit for every event. Like many industries under capitalism, fashion has created a business model that thrives off the exploitation of people and the Earth. It has also fed into the economic conditions that marginalize working-class people and people of diverse bodies. Consumers are important in shifting the demand, but the fashion industry must create viable alternatives.
In challenging this model of fast fashion, there must be an overhaul of the whole industry. From a systemic and cultural level, our relationship with clothing must change to deliver the transitions we need toward a more sustainable economy.
As the third most-polluting industry, the fashion industry must pursue rapid degrowth for us to reach our climate goals and not surpass certain ecological tipping points. Degrowth contrasts with current capitalist beliefs of the need for infinite and endless growth as a marker of successful economies. Instead, degrowth acknowledges that we live on a planet with finite resources, and high-income countries need to scale down unnecessary production. The goal of degrowth is to expand ecological well-being for people and the planet. It also differs from many mainstream “green economy” models that insist economic growth can continue as we transition into a sustainable economy. Degrowth becomes more and more necessary as we hurtle toward climate disaster because the cost of climate action has risen with governmental procrastination.
What could degrowth in the fashion industry look like?
I imagine a shift away from large fashion brands and their exploitative clothing factories to more local markets, perhaps with made-to-order options. The seamstress, tailor and dressmaker could make a comeback as important parts of local clothing economies.
Our relationship with clothes would change from seeing them as short-lived trends to long-term investments. The contemporary activity of purchasing clothes in a mall, selecting a piece made from a faraway place with endless copies at your fingertips, would be less common. Instead, acquiring clothing would take more time, and the labor that it takes to produce the piece would be visible when it’s done by small businesses or local hands. Yes, it would be more expensive than Shein, but a slower and personalized process would allow consumers to value their clothing differently. In this economic model, labor is respected and clothing makers receive a wage that can meet all their needs. Clothing styles would also be much more diverse, as they reflect regional resources and unique cultural and personal details, instead of a homogenous mass-produced style. This may seem like a pipe dream, but this pace of clothing manufacturing was the norm prior to the advent of mass production in the 1860s.
As we face a devastating climate crisis, it is time to rediscover this process and update it for the modern day. Some small fashion brands have embraced this model. Shelly Xu Designs is a fashion technology company committed to zero-waste production. The company eliminates inventory waste by producing clothing based on selected designs only once the items are ordered. Other designers are also coming out with made-to-order clothing, with about a one- to two-month wait time.
In contrast with current fast fashion, in slow fashion, we would know the time, labor and resources that go into making a garment. Garment care through sewing, upcycling and trading clothes would be emphasized in a degrowth fashion system. The end-of-life cycle for clothing would look very different, as clothing that can’t be worn is used to create other things.
I’m grateful that I don’t have to wait to put these things into practice. I’ve learned skills like sewing just so I can begin to implement these practices. But I am far from perfect, and many pieces in my closet are from fast fashion brands that I could afford in college. Yet the environment doesn’t need me to be perfect, it needs me to work towards doing better. With this in mind, the answer isn’t to throw away every Shein or Zara piece I have to restock my closet with chic, “sustainable” brands. Buying clothes from sustainable brands at the same rate of current consumption will not save the planet. Instead, it’s important to care for the clothes I have now as best as I can and slow down my consumption habits. As I do this, I’m transitioning to investing in quality, lifelong pieces when I need them.
As Shein faces backlash for its business model, I hope we can imagine a world beyond fast, unsustainable and exploitative fashion. Our clothes have the potential of carrying our culture, history and personal identity if we let them. As climate change threatens our current system of fashion, let’s imagine a new one that respects the Earth and its people. We don’t have to wait to try; we can begin today with a needle and thread and take time to appreciate the clothing we have.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy