President Donald Trump’s choice to be a top budget adviser once voted as a state senator to declare Social Security and Medicaid unconstitutional.
Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.) backed the failed amendment in 2009, casting Trump’s promises to never cut the two programs into serious disrepute.
Mulvaney was named by Trump to be director of the Office of Management and Budget, an arm of the White House that churns out reports and declarations about policy. OMB is the arm of the Executive Branch that issues Presidential veto threats for legislation winding its way through Congress.
“It seems to me that Rep. Mulvaney is way, way out of touch with what the American people want and what President Trump campaigned on,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Tuesday, at Mulvaney’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Budget Committee.
Mulvaney responded to Sanders’ citation of the vote by saying he does not currently believe the two key welfare programs violate the US Constitution.
“I will not be arguing to the President of the United States that Social Security and Medicare [sic] are unconstitutional,” he told Sanders.
The OMB chief nominee did not, however, back down from advocating cuts to Medicaid and Social Security–despite Trump’s numerous promises on the campaign trail, to refrain from reducing benefits paid out by the two programs.
Mulvaney claimed that without “reforms,” Social Security and Medicaid face significant restraints.
“I believe in 9 or 10 years, the Medicaid Trust Fund is empty,” Mulvaney said. “In roughly 17 or 18 years, the Social Security Trust Fund is empty.”
Sanders responded, noting “there is a lot we can do” that doesn’t involve cuts. He said lifting the cap on Social Security taxes for households earning more than $250,000 would “enable us to extend and expand Social Security very significantly.”
In 2015, Sanders filed cap-lifting legislation that would extend Social Security’s solvency by 45 years, according to his staff. The current inflation-adjusted ceiling on Social Security taxes was set by Congress in 1983, under the Reagan Administration.
“But the problem I am having right now is not just your nomination,” Sanders added. “But the integrity and the honesty of somebody who ran for office on one set of principles nominating somebody else, whose views are very different.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 253 new monthly donors in the next 3 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy