In what is being called a “huge win for voting rights” and a resounding defeat of “Jim Crow-era tactics,” a federal judge on Wednesday struck down a major voter ID law passed by the Republican-dominated Texas state legislature on the grounds that it would place a “disproportionate burden” on black and Latino voters.
Nelva Gonzales Ramos of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas had previously found that the original version of the Republican bill — which was passed in 2011 — was designed with discriminatory intent. In the face of legal challenges, the Texas GOP attempted to soften the law.
These attempts did not go far enough, Ramos ruled on Wednesday, arguing that the changes to the legislation were superficial, and that its discriminatory nature remained “essentially unchanged.”
The New York Times summarized the ruling and its implications:
The decision was only the latest chapter in a yearslong court battle over the state’s voter ID rules, and comes amid concerted efforts by the Trump administration to enact tougher voting restrictions. The stakes are particularly high for Texas: As a result of previous court rulings, the state could be forced to undergo federal oversight of its election procedures…
Judge Ramos not only tossed out the revamped voter ID law, but also struck down the original version, known as Senate Bill 14. She did not rule on whether Texas’ election laws would be put under federal oversight, but said she would consider the issue during the next phase of the case.
Ramos’s ruling was celebrated by civil rights groups and activists.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said in a statement Wednesday that Ramos’s decision to block enforcement of the Texas law “is an important victory for voting rights and those who fight for them every day.”
“Despite the Trump administration’s reversal of a longstanding [Department of Justice] position that Texas engaged in intentional race discrimination in enacting its voter ID law, the court today threw out both the 2011 law and the 2017 version that did not fix the original law’s racially discriminatory purpose,” Gupta concluded. “It’s time for Congress to finally act to restore the Voting Rights Act, and put an end to these kinds of efforts that deny voters of color access to the ballot.”
A recent analysis by the Brennan Center found that “at least 99 bills to restrict access to registration and voting have been introduced in 31 states” in 2017 alone.
Highlighting this research on Wednesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) declared on Twitter: “The real crisis we face is not voter fraud. It is voter suppression.”
Civil rights groups have also expressed alarm at the Brennan Center analysis, which came amid the Trump administration’s push for “suppressive policies” under the guise of rooting out mythical “voter fraud.”
Further, as Buzzfeed’s Chris Geidner notes, under Attorney General Jeff Sessions the Department of Justice has “reversed the position it held during the Obama administration beginning in February, when it stopped backing the challengers to the [Texas] voter ID law.”
In a series of tweets, Kristen Clarke — president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — celebrated the Wednesday ruling while cautioning that the fight against voter suppression efforts at the state and federal level is sure to continue.
“This is the most important victory yet in the long-standing battle against one of the worse voter suppression measures,” Clarke declared. “States like Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, and others have relentlessly pursued voter suppression. We will continue to use the courts to fight!”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.