Faculty at 23 California State University campuses are preparing to strike. They teach nearly half a million students.
After 95 percent of voting members authorized a strike on October 30, the 29,000-member California Faculty Association plans to roll out strikes at Cal Poly Pomona December 4, San Francisco State University December 5, Cal State Los Angeles December 6 and Sacramento State University December 7.
The CFA reopened four broad sections of their contract in May, demanding a 12 percent salary increase, more manageable workloads, more counselors for students, the right to counsel when approached by campus police, more paid leave, and more lactation rooms and gender neutral bathrooms and changing rooms on campuses.
CSU has proposed a 5 percent raise and rejected all of the CFA’s other proposals.
Pay Lagging
The biggest point of contention has been pay, as the CFA has rallied around the slogan “time for 12!” (percent) during this round of negotiations.
“Most of my colleagues are lecture faculty members, and they cannot survive in the Bay with what the university pays them,” said Blanca Missé, an associate professor of French at SFSU. Lecture faculty don’t have guaranteed course loads, and may struggle when classes are cut.
Missé said it was primarily the lagging wages that caused the union to reopen their contract.
CSU claims that faculty salaries align with comparable institutions. CSU spokesperson Hazel Kelly cited a 2022 faculty compensation study.
But Brad Erickson, CFA Chapter President at San Francisco State University, said the study doesn’t compare CSU schools with the University of California system or California’s community colleges and instead compares them to schools in Texas and Florida.
In bargaining, the CSU has told the union that they do not have the money to afford a 12 percent salary increase, said CFA President Charles Toombs. However, Erickson pointed to the 2023 Bunsis Study which stated that the union’s proposal “can be met by the significant annual operating cash surpluses that CSU has generated for many years.”
Erickson said that the CSU’s rejection of the more modest proposals such as increasing the number of lactation rooms, gender neutral bathrooms, changing rooms, or allowing faculty to request counsel when approached by police, has been alarming.
“There is no explanation whatsoever why they have not been able to come to the table with some counterproposals on these demands,” said Missé.
CSU spokesperson Kelly said the CSU already provides lactation spaces for employees and students, and that the CFA’s proposals on faculty rights would violate the CSU’s collective bargaining contract with the campus police union. She did not comment on adding gender neutral bathrooms or changing rooms.
Strike Fomo
The last time the CFA went on strike was in 2011 when CSU Dominguez Hills and CSU East Bay went on strike for one day.
Missé said that striking fell out of fashion at CFA after that, but the tide changed in 2018 with the Red for Ed strikes.
“The CFA leadership, when I joined, was of a mindset that a strike action is powerful when it’s [just] a threat,” Missé said. “Then striking became cool, and [the CFA’s leadership] have FOMO [fear of missing out].”
Missé, who is from Catalonia, said that the attitude toward striking among U.S. unions is fundamentally backwards. “We have tons of t-shirts still in the union office that say ‘I don’t want to strike, but I will,’” Missé said. “[Striking] is the only way to deliver a contract that workers are going to be able to accept.”
Erickson said that the CSU is trying to divide students from the faculty by claiming their recent round of tuition hikes are intended to pay for faculty raises, but it isn’t working. Erickson noted that at the first strike preparation at SFSU there even were more students than faculty. Later meetings drew more faculty than students, he added.
CFA president Toombs also noted that labor unions have regained some of their popularity among the American public.
“I think what is happening now is just not about the CFA,” said Toombs, a San Diego State Africana Studies professor. “It is the labor movement in general… [it] has changed to where workers are prepared to go on strike and withhold their labor.”
This article was originally published at Labor Notes.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy