The Sudanese government suspended cooperation with a global hunger monitor on Monday, on the eve of the initiative announcing that the African country’s civil war has driven the expansion of a famine first declared at a refugee camp earlier this year and expected to keep growing next year without a cease-fire.
Alarm over widespread hunger in Sudan has mounted since fighting erupted between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) — the nation’s official military — and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in April 2023. The famine declaration for Zamzam camp, which houses hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in North Darfur, came in August.
Reuters — which reported on Sudan’s Monday letter to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) and its Famine Review Committee (FRC) — noted that its “investigation found that the Sudanese government obstructed the IPC’s work earlier this year, delaying by months a famine determination for the sprawling Zamzam camp.”
The government’s new letter accuses the monitor of “issuing unreliable reports that undermine Sudan’s sovereignty and dignity,” according to Reuters. “It says the forthcoming IPC report lacks updated malnutrition data and assessments of crop productivity during the recent summer rainy season. The growing season was successful, the letter says. It also notes ‘serious concerns’ about the IPC’s ability to collect data from territories controlled by the RSF.”
Tragic that it’s come to this. Even more tragic is where this is headed.
— William Carter (@WillCarter_NRC) December 24, 2024
More international cooperation, not less, is needed to immediately improve the life chances of millions of Sudanese people affected by conflict and hunger.https://t.co/Q5X2NgNbJ3
The IPC report, released Tuesday, states that “the FRC classifies famine (IPC phase 5) for the period of October to November 2024 in Zamzam, Abu Shouk, and Al Salam camps, as well as in the Western Nuba Mountains, affecting both residents and IDPs. Between December 2024 and May 2025, famine (IPC phase 5) is projected to continue in the same areas and expand in the North Darfur localities of Um Kadadah, Melit, El Fasher, At Tawisha, and Al Lait.”
“There is a risk of famine in the Central Nuba Mountains and in areas likely to experience high influxes of IDPs in North and South Darfur,” the report notes. It adds that “the population in areas of intense conflict in Khartoum (Mayo and Alingaz in Jebel Awlia) and Al Jazirah (Medani Al Kubra and Sharg Al Jazirah) might be experiencing the same conditions as that of the areas classified in famine,” but “the lack of recent data prevents the FRC from confirming whether famine thresholds have been surpassed.”
The document stresses that “the current analysis reflects the situation during the harvest period, a time when hunger and acute malnutrition are typically at their lowest. From December onwards, there will be few seasonal mitigating factors that could improve conditions on the ground. Only a halt to the conflict, and significant scale-up and scale-out of assistance can prevent an even greater catastrophe.”
According to experts, 24.6 million people in Sudan — or half the nation’s population — face “high levels of acute food insecurity (IPC phase 3 or above)” and more than 12 million have been displaced by the current conflict, including over 3.2 million who have fled to neighboring countries.
Famine Review Committee Alert
— The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (@theIPCinfo) December 24, 2024#FAMINE EXPANDS IN SUDAN
Latest @theIPCinfo findings show that Sudan continues to slide into a widening #Famine crisis characterized by widespread starvation and a significant surge in acute malnutrition. The IPC Famine Review Committee… pic.twitter.com/raA3TUTEmn
Leaders at the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and World Food Program (WFP) expressed concern over the Tuesday report and renewed calls for action.
“We must stop famine in the Sudan — it can be done,” said Rein Paulsen, FAO’s director of emergencies and resilience. “We need immediate and unimpeded humanitarian access to deliver food, water, health, and lifesaving emergency agricultural assistance to pull people from the brink. Above all, the immediate cessation of hostilities is an essential first step. We must act now, collectively, and at scale, for the sake of millions of people whose lives are at risk.”
Jean-Martin Bauer, WFP’s director of food security and nutrition analysis, emphasized that across Sudan, “people are getting weaker and weaker and are dying as they have had little to no access to food for months and months.”
“WFP is doing everything we can to get a steady and constant flow of food assistance to the hungriest and hardest-to-reach places in Sudan,” Bauer continued. “We are constantly adapting our operations as the conflict evolves, delivering assistance where and when we can. But recent operational progress is fragile as the situation on the ground is volatile and dangerous.”
UNICEF’s director of emergency operations, Lucia Elmi, pointed out that “the ongoing conflict, continuous displacements, and recurrent disease outbreaks have created a dangerous breeding ground for malnutrition in Sudan.”
“Millions of young lives hang in the balance,” Elmi warned. “The delivery of lifesaving therapeutic food, water, and medicine can help stop the deadly malnutrition crisis in its tracks, but we need safe, sustained, and unimpeded access to reach the most vulnerable children and save lives.”
Human Rights Watch also took note of the new data and called out the warring parties for “willfully” obstructing aid. As Belkis Wille, an associate director in the crisis, conflict, and arms division of the U.S.-based group, wrote Tuesday:
In South Kordofan’s Nuba Mountains, we witnessed famine for ourselves.
In October, we traveled to the Nuba Mountains to interview people displaced by attacks by the RSF and its allies. Witnesses described killings, rape, and destruction in the South Kordofan towns of Habila and Fayu, just 20 km away.
The impact of starvation was clear to see. Almost every person we spoke to bore the marks of hunger. One 8-year-old boy I met, died of starvation during our five-day visit. We saw no international organizations or U.N. agencies providing food assistance during our time there and kept wondering whether some of the people would survive more than a couple of months without aid.
“Before more civilians, including children, die of starvation in Sudan, governments should impose consequences on those responsible. The U.N. Security Council meeting on Sudan on December 19 again contained powerful speeches but little in the way of concrete action,” Willie added. “The U.N. and donors should make a concerted push for immediate aid access throughout Sudan and massively increase support to local responders. The U.N. should also be much clearer and public about the scale of the challenges they face. Civilians in the Nuba Mountains and North Darfur cannot wait till the new year.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.