Skip to content Skip to footer

Elon Musk Opposes Billionaire Tax While Making a Record $36 Billion in One Day

Musk’s net worth of over $288 billion is over 1 percent of the U.S. GDP of $22.7 trillion.

Elon Musk speaks at the 2020 Satellite Conference and Exhibition on March 9, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

This week, the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, who has an estimated net worth of $288.6 billion, voiced his opposition to Democrats’ billionaire tax — while simultaneously breaking the record for wealth an individual has accumulated in one day.

Democrats unveiled a proposal this week that would levy a tax on billionaires’ investment incomes in order to capture some of billionaires’ wealth, rather than just their reported incomes. Under this plan, Musk — who infamously paid $0 in income taxes in 2018 — would pay an estimated $10 billion a year over the next five years, according to an estimate by economist Gabriel Zucman.

Though $10 billion is an unfathomably large amount of money for any individual to own, it is just a small fraction of Musk’s exorbitant wealth — which adds up to approximately 1.3 percent of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product and is more than the value of international oil giant ExxonMobil. By contrast, the median worker in the U.S. makes $1.7 million over a lifetime, meaning that it would take the average worker just under 6,000 lifetimes to make the amount that Musk may get taxed from his investment income in a year.

Furthermore, Musk gained enough money on Monday to cover the next three and a half years of his share of the billionaire tax, with over a billion dollars to spare. A massive Tesla order that caused a boost to the company’s shares pushed Musk’s fortune up by a whopping $36.2 billion, breaking the record for the most wealth someone has accumulated in a single day. For context, $36.2 billion is 10 percent of the amount that the Democrats’ Build Back Better Act would cost in a year — and Musk made it in one day.

In other words, the billionaire tax would be entirely trivial to someone with such an incomprehensibly massive amount of wealth. Still, that hasn’t stopped him from complaining about the tax.

“Exactly,” he said in response to a tweet about writing to representatives to oppose the billionaire tax. Musk then falsely implied that imposing such a tax is a slippery slope to taxing people with less wealth: “Eventually, they run out of other people’s money and then they come for you.”

This conservative talking point is patently untrue: the billionaire tax has nothing to do with taxes on millionaires and even less to do with taxes on the middle and lower classes, which Democrats are staunchly opposed to raising. It doesn’t even raise taxes on the wealthy, which maxes out at 37 percent for income slightly over $500,000 for individuals — a tax rate that Musk isn’t subject to because he reports a low-to-zero yearly income to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a well-known tax avoidance technique for the ultra-wealthy.

Studies have found that decades of tax cuts for the wealthy have not resulted in the promised trickle-down effect and instead only allowed the rich to accumulate even more wealth while paying a lower effective tax rate.

Later, Musk implied in a tweet that the task of allocating the country’s resources is best left up to private interests rather than the government, despite the fact that low tax rates for the rich and corporations have led to the current era of runaway wealth. “Who is best at capital allocation – government or entrepreneurs – is indeed what it comes down to,” Musk said in response to a tweet saying that he should be trusted with resource allocation, rather than the Treasury Department. “The tricksters will conflate capital allocation with consumption.”

This position is especially ironic coming from Musk, who benefits greatly from government subsidies. In 2015, when his companies were a fraction of their current size, the Los Angeles Times reported that Tesla, SolarCity (which has now been absorbed by Tesla) and SpaceX had collected a total of $4.9 billion in aid from the government in the form of grants, incentives and tax breaks.

At the time, Tesla and SpaceX were worth $25 billion and $12 billion, respectively, meaning that the government subsidies contributed significantly to the businesses. Six years later, with the help of the government, Tesla is worth $1 trillion, and SpaceX $100 billion.

Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), who crafted the billionaire tax this week, fired back at Musk on Tuesday. “The people who are clearly trying to be tricky are people who are trying to find a way to not pay taxes,” he said.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy