A group of House Democrats is pushing to censure Rep. George Santos (New York) following a remarkable series of scandals regarding the Republican’s fabrications about his professional life and potential financial violations.
The effort is being led by Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-New York), who is set to introduce a resolution Monday to censure Representative Santos for “defrauding the people of the United States,” as Torres said in a tweet.
“I have a message to House Republicans who, for too long, have been protecting Mr. Santos, who has disgraced the United States Congress,” Torres wrote. “Stop treating Mr. Santos as untouchable. The time has come for Congress to hold him accountable.”
The vote could come soon, with one senior Democratic aide telling The New York Times the party is planning to force a vote on the issue before the House goes into August recess.
Democrats first attempted to punish Santos in May, mounting a vote to expel him shortly after he was indicted on 13 federal charges of fraud and lying on official documents. The vote failed, with the House instead referring the matter to the House Ethics Committee to investigate.
Censures are largely symbolic, representing a strong rebuke against a lawmaker and little else. The harshest punishment associated with censures is a removal from committee assignments, which isn’t required when a member is censured but is often included in the vote.
The censure vote isn’t likely to succeed. Even though very few Republicans have been outwardly supportive of Santos in an effort to distance themselves from the many allegations against him, they’re still not likely to censure a member of their own party. Further, though Republicans in Santos’s own state have turned against him, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-California) has stood beside the lawmaker.
Still, circumstances between May’s expulsion push and the censure are slightly different, with the House Ethics Committee not yet having put out any findings and a censure needing only a simple majority vote to pass.
“If you are a member of Congress who has informally condemned Mr. Santos, then you should have no trouble formally censuring him,” Torres told The New York Times. “He has disgraced the institution, and the institution should speak with one voice against his misconduct.”
The three-page censure resolution cites Santos’s lies about his college degrees and career, as well as other more bizarre claims, like his lie that he helped produce Broadway musical Spider-Man: Turn Off The Dark, per the Times.
It does not include charges regarding potential violations of campaign laws, which are still pending. Santos has been accused of multiple counts of wire fraud, theft of public funds and money laundering, as well as making false statements on federal financial disclosure forms.
More revelations on Santos have come out in the months since he was initially charged. Most recently, records released Friday showed Santos spent the majority of the paltry $133,000 he raised during the last quarter for his reelection on repaying the mysterious $700,000 loan he made to his campaign last year, while spending almost nothing on campaigning.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.