Skip to content Skip to footer

McCarthy Says “It’s Not My Role” to Remove George Santos Despite Rampant Lies

McCarthy has refused to discipline Santos despite having numerous options to do so as speaker of the House.

Speaker Kevin McCarthy speaks at a news conference in Statuary Hall of the U.S. Capitol Building on January 12, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-California) is doubling down on his backing of Republican Rep. George Santos (New York), even as other Republican officials call for Santos’s resignation and legal and political problems pile up for the freshman representative and seemingly inveterate liar.

McCarthy, who has stood by Santos for weeks, even as Santos has admitted to fabricating huge swaths of his resume and life story, reiterated his support for Santos in a press conference on Tuesday. The speaker, for whom Santos’s vote was necessary in order to win the speakership, threw up his hands, saying that he is not in the position to compel Santos to resign or punish Santos as the leader of the House — even though actions McCarthy has taken in recent days have contradicted that claim.

“No. You know why I’m standing by him? Because his constituents voted for him,” McCarthy told reporters on Tuesday, disregarding the facts that Santos’s numerous lies were only uncovered after he had already been elected, and that polls find that voters now want him out. “I do not have the power simply because if I disagree with somebody or what they have said that I remove them from elected office.”

“If for some way when we go through [the] Ethics [Committee] that he has broken the law, then we will remove him, but it’s not my role,” McCarthy continued. “I believe in the rule of law. A person’s innocent until proven guilty.”

McCarthy’s comments go against his own actions. For instance, McCarthy is blocking several Democrats, Representatives Adam Schiff (California), Eric Swalwell (California) and Ilhan Omar (Minnesota) from committees, citing flimsy claims with no legal backing; Schiff and Swalwell have not been “proven guilty” in any legal context of the accusations that McCarthy and Republicans have hurled against them. Omar, meanwhile, has said that she only has a target on her back because she’s Muslim.

It’s ironic that McCarthy would claim to hold the will of the voters sacred when it comes to Santos, since McCarthy was one of 147 Republicans in Congress who voted to overturn the 2020 presidential election and ignore the will of tens of millions of voters to install Donald Trump.

The speaker’s comments also go against historical precedents.

Speakers of the House exercise extensive power as both the leader of the chamber and as the head of the party with the majority of House seats. It is rare for a member of the House to be removed through the formal process of a two-thirds vote; it is far less rare for a member to be pressured to resign and for the member to step down, as Republicans have done several times in recent decades.

If McCarthy were concerned about Santos’s rampant lies and questionable campaign finance practices, there would be other options to rein the Republican in, like setting up a censure vote or refusing to seat him on committees. But McCarthy refuses to take any disciplinary action and has seated him on two committees, broadcasting to future and current politicians that Santos’s behavior is acceptable within the Republican Party.

In reality, House Republicans decided long ago that they would not punish Santos, as people familiar with discussions have said; with their slim majority of only four seats in the House, Republicans are likely only considering their power, rather than the ethics of their members.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.