The commanding general of the District of Columbia National Guard said on Tuesday that his agency was restricted by the Pentagon from taking actions that could have allowed for a greater security presence or faster reaction time on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol building ahead of attacks that took place there on January 6 by pro-Trump loyalists.
Maj. Gen. William Walker said that leaders at the Pentagon restricted his authority to take preventive steps to address concerns about former President Donald Trump’s supporters, as the possibility for violence in Washington, D.C., became known well before the rally that took place outside the White House that day.
Local National Guard commanders usually have the ability to take responsive actions when lives are at risk or significant property damage is possible in certain scenarios, particularly when it isn’t possible to obtain approval quickly.
But Walker, speaking ahead of testimony in a House committee hearing set to take place behind closed doors, said he was restricted from being able to respond preemptively when Trump loyalists besieged the Capitol.
“All military commanders normally have immediate response authority to protect property, life, and in my case, federal functions — federal property and life. But in this instance I did not have that authority,” Walker explained in an interview with The Washington Post.
A detailed timeline of the day’s events shows that the Pentagon took about an hour and a half to approve requests for the National Guard to respond to the Capitol breach, according to reporting from The Hill.
Former Army secretary Ryan McCarthy also told The Post that the restrictions from the Pentagon were put in place due to criticism that the Department of Defense had received for the way in which they had handled Black Lives Matter protests last summer.
“After June, the authorities were pulled back up to the secretary of defense’s office. Any time we would employ troops and guardsmen in the city, you had to go through a rigorous process,” McCarthy said.
Many have noted that there were significant differences in police and military presence and actions during the Capitol breach of January 6, compared to the Black Lives Matter protests that took place over the summer, which received a significantly swifter preemptive security response. President Joe Biden has himself criticized the wide discrepancies in how each event was approached earlier this month.
“No one can tell me that if it had been a group of Black Lives Matter protestors yesterday that they wouldn’t have been treated very differently than the mob that stormed the Capitol,” Biden wrote in a tweet on January 7. “We all know that’s true — and it’s unacceptable.”
The D.C. National Guard wasn’t the only agency that didn’t prepare enough for the Capitol breach that took place on January 6, which resulted in the death of five individuals. The U.S. Capitol Police were also slow to react or even prepare for the possibility of violence on that day, according to several accounts from officers who spoke to The Associated Press earlier this month about the event.
In those same closed-door House hearings on Tuesday, Yogananda Pittman, the acting chief of the Capitol Police, acknowledged that the agency had been aware of a “strong potential for violence” that day, and apologized directly to Congress for the ill-prepared response.
“I am here to offer my sincerest apologies on behalf of the department,” Pittman, who was not in charge of Capitol Police on January 6, said.
The National Guard plans to keep 5,000 troops in Washington, D.C., through mid-March, because of the continued threats of violence that exist from far right groups and ardent Trump supporters who refuse to accept the results of November’s presidential election, based on false claims of election fraud that the former president continues to push.
Many believe Trump is to blame for having instigated his loyalists to attack the Capitol. Trump invited his most ardent supporters to descend on Washington, D.C., in several tweets prior to January 6, including in one post he made on December 20 where he said the rally he’d be hosting would be “wild.”
During the event itself, Trump continued to peddle false claims of fraud and used language that appeared to motivate his loyalists to attack the Capitol, including at one point saying to his supporters that they’d “never take back our country with weakness.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.