Skip to content Skip to footer

QAnon Trump Supporter Jacob Chansley Seeks Pardon From Trump for Capitol Breach

Chansley’s lawyer argues that he shouldn’t be punished for accepting the invitation, instructions from the president.

Jacob Anthony Chansley, who also goes by the name “QAnon Shaman," screams inside the Senate chamber after the U.S. Capitol was breached by a pro-Trump mob during a joint session of Congress on January 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

The man who was seen during the storming of the Capitol building last week wearing fur, horns, and red, white and blue face paint, is seeking a pardon from President Donald Trump for criminal charges related to his role in the events, which led to the deaths of five people.

Jacob Anthony Chansley, who also uses the alias of Jake Angeli, faces several criminal charges, including knowingly entering or remaining in a restricted building or grounds without the legal authority to do so, as well as violent entry and disorderly conduct inside the Capitol.

A legal filing from the Department of Justice (DOJ) states that Chansley left a threatening note for Vice President Mike Pence while he was in the Capitol that day, which stated “it’s only a matter of time, justice is coming.”

“Strong evidence, including Chansley’s own words and actions at the Capitol, supports that the intent of the Capitol rioters was to capture and assassinate elected officials in the United States Government,” according to the filing. The DOJ also noted that Chansley was seen carrying a spear inside the Capitol during the attack.

Chansley’s attorney, Albert Watkins, believes that Trump should pardon him and others that took part in the breach because it was the president himself that invited them to Washington, D.C., for a protest rally, and encouraged them to go to the Capitol during a speech outside the White House.

Indeed, Trump had invited his loyalists to come to Washington, D.C., last month, tweeting on December 20 that the protest on January 6 would be “wild.” Trump incited his supporters to take action against lawmakers as they were certifying the election results, telling his loyalists to head to the Capitol, adding that they would “never take back our country with weakness.”

“My client had heard the oft-repeated words of President Trump,” Watkins said in a statement to The Washington Post. “The words and invitation of a president are supposed to mean something.”

Chansley turned himself in to police on Saturday, which Watkins suggested should encourage Trump to pardon his client.

“Given the peaceful and compliant fashion in which Mr. Chansley comported himself, it would be appropriate and honorable for the president to pardon Mr. Chansley and other like-minded, peaceful individuals who accepted the president’s invitation with honorable intentions,” Watkins said.

The U.S. Constitution provides the president with tremendous pardon powers that do not require direct oversight. Trump has often used that power to pardon or commute the sentences of his loyalists.

“It is now clear that for Trump, no matter what the crime — whether it is corruption, lying to law enforcement or even war crimes — justice does not apply to those who have been loyal to him,” Noah Bookbinder, a former DOJ criminal prosecutor and the current executive director for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, wrote in an opinion piece for USA Today last month. “We have one justice system for his predominantly rich, white and male friends and allies, and another for the rest of America.”

Trump is reportedly considering granting himself a pardon as well. While legal theorists continue to debate the matter, a legal memo from the Watergate era suggests he cannot.

“Under the fundamental rule that no one may be a judge in his own case, the President cannot pardon himself,” the memo stated.

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $50,000 to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?