It might seem like I’m writing a lot about fascism lately. It’s just the drought of journalists using the F-word that makes any use of the word stand out — this as a bona fide fascist is within striking distance of the White House.
In case you were on the fence and reluctant to believe that the Republican candidate for president — the one who claimed he could shoot a man in the middle of Fifth Avenue without losing steam among his supporters — is a fascist, this week’s pronouncements by him and his allegedly more palatable running mate reiterate the point.
As he climbs back up to a statistical dead heat in the polls, Trump complimented Vladimir Putin for his leadership style. Media criticism focused on the fact that Putin ordered the invasion and occupation of Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula. Others dusted off Cold War tropes to remind us that we hate the Russians. All of this misses the point that Trump zeroed in on Putin’s leadership style. This demands that we look at how he treats his own people — how he leads his own nation.
In Russia, it’s not healthy to oppose Putin. Prominent Russian journalist Nataliya Gevorkyan, for example, has recently survived two violent attacks by unknown assailants. Her former newspaper, Kommersant, like practically all of the major Russian press outlets, is now a Putin propaganda organ. Gevorkan has since left Russia as Putin allies continue to buy up private press outlets.
Journalists and bloggers who question the government are also jailed or killed. The Committee to Protect Journalists recently ranked Russia in the top 10 nations where journalists are murdered with impunity. While Russian authorities claim that 90 percent of murders in that country are solved, when it comes to the murders of journalists, in 90 percent of the cases there is no prosecution.
Last year Putin’s government labeled internationally affiliated human rights groups operating in Russia as “foreign agents.” This year, Putin’s government issued an outright ban on many such entities, now listing them as “undesirable foreign organizations.” Russians who associate with such human rights and environmental organizations can face up to six years in prison. Another new law has sent bloggers who oppose Russia’s invasion of Crimea to jail. Political opponents such as former Yeltsin-era Deputy Prime Minister Boris Nemtsov are sometimes conveniently assassinated.
At the end of last year, when human rights activists alleged Putin involvement in the murder of opposition journalists in Russia, Donald Trump defending him, telling MSNBC that Putin is “running his country and at least he’s a leader, unlike what we have in this country.” Murdering journalists was no big deal; as Trump explained, “I think our country does plenty of killing also.”
Last week the Republican presidential candidate praised Putin for having “very strong control” over his country, adding that “he’s been a leader far more than our president has been a leader.” The Republican vice presidential candidate, Mike Pence, doubled down on Trump’s comments, calling them “inarguable.” This is the Republican White House ticket. This is their idea of a leader.
The presidential election is a little over seven weeks away. Expect the American media to focus more on Hillary Clinton’s bout of pneumonia than on the Republican Party’s embrace of fascism. Hell, Trump might win and be “a leader far more than [Barack Obama] has been a leader.” There’s no sense pissing him off.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.