Skip to content Skip to footer

5 Trump-Voting Counties in Oregon Vote to Leave State and Join Idaho Instead

The “Greater Idaho” movement faces nearly insurmountable odds at being successful.

Trump supporters listen to a speaker during a rally and caravan in Oregon City, Oregon, on September 7, 2020.

Voters in five counties in rural areas of Oregon voted on Tuesday to support a partisan movement to join Idaho, over what appears to be complaints of having to live in a state where there are more liberals than there are conservatives.

Those five counties have now joined two others in Oregon, representing about three-quarters of the state’s land area (though only about 2.7 percent of its total population), in what’s being called the “Greater Idaho” movement.

The movement appears to be wholly partisan, as its organizers say on their website that they’re tired of belonging to a state whose population is more Democratic-leaning than Republican. The movement also appears to be seeking to remove parts of northern California and place that area under Idaho’s purview as well.

“We need to unite our neighbors around the idea of moving the border so that we can convince state legislators to stop holding our counties captive in a blue state,” the group said in a statement responding to the votes on Tuesday.

President Joe Biden defeated former President Donald Trump in Oregon by a nearly 16-point margin. But in Jefferson County, one of the jurisdictions that has voted in favor of joining the “Greater Idaho” movement, Trump defeated Biden by around 23 percent — however, that county’s vote totals represented fewer than 12,000 of the 2.37 million ballots cast in the state.

In contrast, Trump won the state of Idaho with approximately 64 percent of the vote, aligning closely with the counties in Oregon that wish to join their neighbor.

The movement, however, faces a number of problems, not the least of which is the fact that three of the seven counties that have voted to break off from Oregon are not connected to the other four counties, to each other or even to Idaho. Both states would need to approve the transfer, as well as Congress, according to the U.S. Constitution.

Only one of the states’ governors — Gov. Brad Little (R-Idaho) — says he’s open to the movement’s goals.

There have only been three instances of similar territorial shifts in U.S. history: Kentucky was formed in 1792 out of territory that was once claimed by Virginia; Maine, which was part of Massachusetts for the first few decades after the Constitution was signed, became a state in 1820; and during the Civil War, counties that were still loyal to the Union broke off from Virginia to become West Virginia.

Another issue that members of the movement may not have considered: While the counties voted with large majorities of constituents favoring the move to Idaho, there are still a sizable proportion of residents who do not back it. According to the “Greater Idaho” movement’s own numbers, close to two-in-five voters in the counties that voted on Tuesday were opposed to the measure.

Briefly, we wanted to update you on where Truthout stands this month.

To be brutally honest, Truthout is behind on our fundraising goals for the year. There are a lot of reasons why. We’re dealing with broad trends in our industry, trends that have led publications like Vice, BuzzFeed, and National Geographic to make painful cuts. Everyone is feeling the squeeze of inflation. And despite its lasting importance, news readership is declining.

To ensure we stay out of the red by the end of the year, we have a long way to go. Our future is threatened.

We’ve stayed online over two decades thanks to the support of our readers. Because you believe in the power of our work, share our transformative stories, and give to keep us going strong, we know we can make it through this tough moment.

We’ve launched a campaign to raise $42,000 in the next 6 days. Please consider making a donation today.