President Obama should have thrown the banksters in jail.
That’s more or less what former Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke said in an interview this weekend with USA Today.
Bernanke doesn’t get off totally scot-free here.
See more news and opinion from Thom Hartmann at Truthout here.
If he really felt that way back in 2009, he could have said so publicly.
Yes, the Fed “isn’t a law enforcement agency,” but its word still carries a lot of weight in Washington and around the world.
If Bernanke, as the Fed chair, had said that it was a good idea to prosecute bank executives, that would have put a ton of pressure on the Justice Department to do so.
But anyways, all questions of personal responsibility aside, Bernanke is right.
We SHOULD have criminally punished more banksters after the financial crisis, and the fact that we didn’t – and still haven’t – will go down in history as one of this administration’s biggest screw-ups.
That’s because the only thing that actually keeps big financial institutions in check is prosecutions.
Just ask Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.
In the wake of the savings and loans debacle of the 1980s, the Reagan and Bush administrations prosecuted more than 1,000 different individuals for their role in the crisis, and of those prosecutions, 839 resulted in convictions.
The Reagan and Bush administrations also stripped the savings and loans associations of their assets, nationalized them and then resold them to the public using a special agency called the Resolution Trust Corporation.
Not coincidentally, savings and loans associations have been remarkably stable ever since.
President Obama should have done what Reagan did.
He should have criminally prosecuted the Wall Street banksters.
But he didn’t, and if there’s one person most responsible for that, it’s former Attorney General Eric Holder, the granddaddy of “too big to jail.”
Back when he was a deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration, Holder wrote an infamous memo in which he laid out a plan for how to deal with large financial crimes.
Nicknamed the “Holder Doctrine,” his plan was simple: Instead of prosecuting big banks and thus “destabilizing” the financial system, the government should just hit them with financial penalties – just fine them.
Ten years later, Holder got a chance to put his doctrine into practice when he became Attorney General, and he followed it to a tee.
During his tenure as the nation’s top law enforcement officer, no major Wall Street player in the great mortgage bubble of the 2000’s went to jail for their crimes.
Holder’s Justice Department did slap a few big banks like JP Morgan with multi-million dollar settlement fines, but those fines are chump change compared to the billions those banks take in every year in profits, including the profits from illegal activity.
These fines have just become a routine cost of doing business for the banksters.
They’re also tax-deductible, which makes the idea that they could ever serve as a deterrent to future bad behavior just flat-out ridiculous.
Thanks to the Holder Doctrine, the big banks are bigger than ever and comfortable in the knowledge that they’re still too big to jail, six years after they got caught robbing the US blind.
That needs to change, and it needs to change now.
Eric Holder is now out as Attorney General, and his successor, Lorretta Lynch has promised to hold the banks to a tougher standard.
Let’s hope that standard means prosecuting high-up executives and CEO’s, because if it doesn’t, the odds of another crash are rapidly approaching 100 percent.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.