President Donald Trump featured a video produced by the White House at a press briefing on Monday during which he took on a decidedly defensive tone toward reporters and the media in general over his slow response to the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.
The video, which some have described as being propagandistic, featured selected news clips and reports from media that put Trump’s actions during the crisis in a positive tone. Yet, there were glaring problems with the video, which reporters noted both during the press conference and in reporting later on.
One of the biggest issues was the selective editing that was taken to produce parts of the video, which cast the president as responding adequately, contrary to what some of the original media clips intended to portray. In one clip, for example, New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman’s voice is heard, as she was recorded during a podcast earlier this year describing some of the administration’s actions during the first month of the crisis.
Discussing Trump’s decision to close travel from China in January, Haberman said in that podcast, “At the end of the day, it was probably effective, because it did actually take a pretty aggressive measure against the spread of the virus.”
The clip seems to suggest that media were supportive or happy with his response to COVID-19’s spread in the U.S. after that action took place. But the recording provided by the White House omits the very next sentence from Haberman’s podcast.
“The problem is, it was one of the last things that he did for several weeks,” she said.
Indeed, the video, which was constructed as a timeline of events of actions Trump and his administration had taken from January to April, had another glaring omission: almost all of the month of February was missing from the timeline itself, during which the White House made very little, if any, decisive moves to prepare for the disease’s impending spread.
CBS News White House correspondent Paula Reid attempted to ask the president about the “gap” that was noticeable in the video. Trump wasn’t having it.
Reid started out by asking what good stopping travel from China did if no actions were taken immediately after it.
“The argument is that you bought yourself some time. You didn’t use it to prepare hospitals, you didn’t use it to ramp up testing,” Reid began.
Trump interrupted her at that point, perhaps trying to disrupt her line of questioning. “Nobody thought we should do it, and when I did it —”
Reid didn’t let up. “But what did you do with the time that you bought? The month of February?” she asked.
President Donald J Trump calms a nation on edge pic.twitter.com/HO6Ou1XJzg
— Andrew Lawrence (@ndrew_lawrence) April 13, 2020
The president continued to argue against her line of questioning, pointing out that the United States had zero cases and zero deaths from the disease in mid-January, totally ignoring the point of Reid’s question.
When Reid once again noted that she was asking about February, and how the video “has a complete gap” during that month, Trump went on the attack against her character and her network’s reputation.
“You know you’re a fake, you know that? Your whole network, the way you cover it is fake,” he responded.
Trump continued to insist that the way he reacted to the disease was perfect. “We really have done this right. The problem is the press doesn’t cover it the way it should be,” he added.
February is indeed a controversial time for Trump, as he spent much of the month downplaying the threat from COVID-19 to the nation.
On February 19, for instance, Trump suggested that the virus would go away with warmer temperatures, insinuating there was no need to raise questions about what should be done.
“I think when we get into April, in the warmer weather, that has a very negative effect on that and that type of a virus. So let’s see what happens, but I think it’s going to work out fine,” he said.
On February 26, amid growing criticisms that he wasn’t acting in a way that reflected health experts’ concerns, the president said the number of cases (at that time, reported to be around 15), was “going to be down to close to zero” within a matter of days. “That’s a pretty good job we’ve done,” Trump added.
And on February 28, during a campaign rally in South Carolina, Trump accused Democrats of trying to politicize the disease in order to make him look bad. “This is their new hoax,” he said that evening.
Trump continued to downplay the seriousness of the disease into March, but changed his tone when it was clear the disease wasn’t as innocuous as he had insisted it was. On March 13, he finally declared a national emergency.
As of 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday — 48 days after he said the number of cases would be close to zero within a short period of time — there are more than 582,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 within the United States, including nearly 24,000 recorded deaths so far.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.