On October 5, instead of setting up breakfast for thousands of college students, 700 cafeteria workers at the richest university in the world kicked off their first strike in three decades.
Harvard University’s dining hall workers are demanding a living wage of $35,000 a year, and fighting administration efforts to increase co-pays on top of already costly health insurance plans.
Though their average wage is $22 an hour, workers say it’s a struggle to get by during summer breaks, when they’re out of work or forced to rely on lower-wage temp jobs. They say university administrators are unconcerned about the situation.
“Their attitude is ‘go find another job,'” said pantry steward Anabela Pappas, who has worked on the campus for 35 years. But “nobody wants to hire you for three months.”
The strikers, members of UNITE HERE Local 26, set up 6 a.m. pickets at the freshman dining hall, which serves 1,600 students each day. Five hundred workers, students, and community supporters picketed different campus sites, then merged for a march and rally. Strike chants are in three languages: English, Spanish, and Portuguese.
To feed students during the strike, it’s rumored that the university has brought in high volumes of frozen food. “Students say they want cooked meals, not frozen stuff or fried food,” said Pappas, who was thrilled with the outpouring of student support on the strike’s first day. “We got more than 700 flowers from the students — they brought us fruit, food, water, and lots of hugs.”
In 19 negotiating sessions since May, even with the help of a federal mediator, the union and university administration couldn’t reach a deal. In September, workers voted 591-18 to strike.
“Other Harvard workers have consistently demonstrated that they are with us,” said UNITE HERE Negotiator Mike Kramer. “It’s only an isolated Harvard administration that’s standing against the workers.”
Trickle-Down U
With a $36 billion endowment and a $63 million operating surplus in 2015, Harvard can’t claim financial hardship. The university recently raised $7 billion in the first three years of a five-year capital campaign.
University negotiators defend the wages offered to dining hall workers as generous.
But factoring in that most workers are laid off for the summer and January when the university scales back its services and classes, their average yearly take-home pay is only $32,000. And while employees are out of work, they can’t collect unemployment.
Some employees work nine months out of the year, said 13-year employee Kerry Maiato. Others work as little as seven months.
Dining workers are demanding a $35,000 minimum yearly salary, and pressing the university to offer solutions. One approach would be to provide similar work for equal pay during the summer, when the campus is open, albeit with scaled-down activity. Another alternative would be to boost the hourly wage to help workers save up for the dry months.
Pappas works as a temp for campus mail services over the summer — earning $8 an hour less than her job with dining services, and without holiday pay. Others temp for Harvard’s real estate office, where they also make much less. “I feel like we are rented out,” Pappas said, “doing the jobs their employees do so they can go on vacation.”
“We’re told that we are all Harvard workers,” said Pappas, “but we don’t feel that way when we don’t get the same pay or when on the Fourth of July we don’t get paid.”
Dining workers also want to stop the administration from raising their health care costs, already at $281 a month for the most common family plan, according to university data.
“For the increases they are asking, it’s not sustainable for my family,” Maiato said, “especially in the city of Boston. It may not seem like a lot to the administration, but it does to folks who don’t work year-round.”
120-Foot Mural
Students, neighbors, and alumni have been showing their support at campus rallies and on social media. The Cambridge City Council has voted to endorse the workers’ demands. So have Harvard’s Undergraduate Council and the Crimson, the campus’s daily newspaper.
“I think people are in shock that Harvard is doing this,” Pappas said.
Local 26 held a rally and picket for a fair contract before the spring semester wrapped up. Over the summer, even though most members weren’t working on campus, 600 signed pledges to strike and took photos of themselves for a 120-foot mural.
Workers unveiled the mural at their September 7 announcement that they were preparing to strike, and again at the September 15 strike vote.
“All we are asking for is a fair contract,” Maiato said, “for Harvard to let us into their community.”
New book from Labor Notes: Secrets of a Successful Organizer is a step-by-step guide to building power on the job. “Full of so many creative examples and powerful rank-and-file stories, it makes you want to dive right in.” Buy one today, only $15.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.