“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.”
– Attributed to Mark Twain
I have never been a great fan of Rahm Emanuel. In his clips, he seems to relish his image as a foul-mouthed, vengeful pit viper. He looks like one, too. Don’t get me wrong. At least he’s a vertebrate. Karl Rove is one of those poisonous Australian jellyfish. He sleeps in a jar of seawater at night.
I know that even Democrats need people like that, but as Barack Obama morphed into Hopey McChange, I found myself surrendering my Buddhist principles of compassion for human folly. I devolved into reptilian animosity toward Rahm Emanuel, who came to represent for me all the failings of the Obama White House. I wrote letters to my influential media contacts, begging them to expose him. They didn’t even respond to say no. This inflamed my anger even more.
When [Martha] Coakley conceded, I had a raving fit and told my wife that Rahm Emanuel was a creepy Israeli [unprintable string of utterly noxious ad hominem epithets that only a Jew like me can apply to another Jew] who should be exiled to his father’s basement in Tel Aviv. Anita said, “Well, he may very well be an unsavory character, but I don’t think you should say things like that. Are you sure his father lives in Tel Aviv?”
The Massachusetts result was foreordained when Rahm Emanuel drove Howard Dean out of the party power structure. Dean would have been on top of the situation long before the primary. He would have been in touch with the younger people and known why Coakley was so widely disliked by the Massachusetts party insiders. She might have been nominated anyway, but funds and resources would have been deployed much earlier.
Rahm purged the man who invented a new form of political campaign and in the process gave Democrats the massive victories of 2006 and 2008. He then substituted Beltway centralism for Dean’s grassroots (and/or netroots, if you will) approach to operational politics. Instead of embracing Dean’s followers as a counter balance to the corporate whoremasters, Rahm went out of his way to trash them.
“There are no liberals left to get,” Rahm Emmanuel said during the health insurance reform scheme-athon. Yep. Well, you just changed that, Tough Guy.
Now what?
[1] President Obama is surrounded by enemies, a prisoner in the White House with various guns – literally and figuratively – pointed at his head. He needs a Chicago-style political gangster as a bodyguard who is 100 percent loyal to him and no one else. I doubt that he would be inclined to make any changes.
Recommendation: Rahm must make an accommodation with Dean. Otherwise, 2010 is going to be a repeat of Massachusetts, and Barack Hussein Obama will probably be a one-term president. The most troubling aspect of Massachusetts is that the GOP now has a viable presidential candidate, and his name is Scott Brown. This is not Sarah Palin. This is a very astute politician who looks like an action figure and can talk like a sane person when he wants to.
[2] Joe Biden was right about Afghanistan. He knows how things work, and he knows what it is to be a Democrat. He hasn’t enriched himself in office. He has the best security credentials in Washington, if unfortunately on the side of repression. He’s no Dennis Kucinich, but he can add and subtract, an uncommon skill among high-ranking politicians.
Recommendation: The president should use Biden as a counterweight to Rahm. The vice president can probably broker a deal with Dean and act as a political center to unify the party for 2010.
[3] I would speculate that if 51 votes ruled in the Senate, the Democratic Party would be able to give the nation a record of accomplishment that would merit its favor in 2010. Joe Biden has observed, “This is the first time every single solitary decision has required 60 senators. No democracy has survived needing a supermajority.”
Recommendation: The filibuster has to go. Its modern use was established to protect the rights of the Dixiecrats, who have evolved into today’s Republicans. The red states are an exact match for the slave states and territories. The results are exactly what you would expect. We are paralyzed by their venom. And we have begun not merely to rot, but to stink.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.