On Monday morning, a nonprofit government watchdog organization called out former President Donald Trump, implying that his actions in the final weeks of his presidency should disqualify him from serving in any office again.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) wrote in a tweet that while there isn’t a federal law barring former presidents from running for office if they’ve been indicted of a crime, a constitutional amendment does bar some people from running if they’ve engaged in or encouraged others to participate in an insurrection.
“Donald Trump has been indicted twice,” CREW said in its tweet, referring to Trump’s federal indictment last week alleging that he mishandled sensitive government documents after leaving the White House, as well as his indictment in New York state court alleging that he used hush money payments in furtherance of criminal action. “That doesn’t necessarily disqualify him from serving as president, but the Constitution’s 14th Amendment does.”
The third clause of the 14th Amendment states that no person who has “previously taken an oath…to support the Constitution of the United States” may serve in office again if they have “engaged in insurrection” against the country, or “given aid or comfort” to those who did. How this provision may be enforced is left ambiguous, but it’s widely assumed a court action declaring someone an insurrectionist would suffice.
It’s possible that another Department of Justice (DOJ) indictment, relating to Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, could include insurrectionist charges against the former president. However, CREW and its president, Noah Bookbinder, have previously promised to file a lawsuit against Trump in order to block him from running.
Many political observers have described the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol — which began moments after Trump delivered an incendiary speech to his followers outside the White House — as an “insurrection,” as its aim was to prevent Congress from certifying the 2020 presidential election. Under this line of argument, Trump’s speech could feasibly be seen as giving “aid” to those who attacked the Capitol.
In a letter directed to Trump in late 2022, Bookbinder promised that he and CREW would block Trump from running in the 2024 presidential election, “based on [his] engaging in the insurrection that culminated on January 6, 2021.”
“The evidence that you engaged in insurrection as contemplated by the Fourteenth Amendment — including by mobilizing, inciting, and aiding those who attacked the Capitol — is overwhelming,” Bookbinder told Trump.
So far, such a lawsuit has not yet materialized, even as Trump has been on the campaign trail for the GOP nomination.
Although CREW rightfully pointed out that indictments cannot prevent a person from running for the presidency, a majority of Americans think Trump should be disqualified from office if he’s convicted.
Fifty-two percent of Americans believe Trump has committed a serious crime at some point in his life, according to a Yahoo News/YouGov poll conducted at the end of May. Furthermore, 62 percent of the poll’s respondents said that being found guilty of a serious crime — including being indicted for mishandling secretive government records — should disqualify a person from the presidency. Just 23 percent said that if Trump is indeed convicted it shouldn’t prevent him from running for president.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.