Skip to content Skip to footer

Two-Thirds of Voters Want Verdict in Trump Trial Before Election Day

The trial is delayed indefinitely due to a constitutional legal challenge by Trump’s lawyers.

Former President Donald Trump is seen on January 26, 2024, in New York City.

A new poll shows that nearly two-thirds of United States voters want a verdict to be issued before the 2024 election commences in the trial weighing former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Trump faces four federal indictment charges from Department of Justice (DOJ) Special Counsel Jack Smith, relating to his actions (and inaction) during the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, as well as his role in the “fake electors” plot to usurp the results of the Electoral College, which he lost to President Joe Biden.

The charges were filed against Trump in August 2023. Currently, the trial is being delayed indefinitely. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled on Tuesday against a claim brought forward by Trump’s lawyers asserting he had “presidential immunity” privileges that protected him from any liability from that day’s events. But the trial might not restart right away, due to Trump’s legal team likely appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court.

A CNN/SSRS poll published Monday suggests that Trump’s delay tactics are deeply unpopular with the U.S. electorate, who wants the trial to be concluded before they go to the polls in the 2024 race, a likely rematch between Trump and Biden.

According to the poll, 48 percent of voters say it’s “essential” the trial be concluded before the election happens, while another 16 percent say they would prefer a verdict come about before that time. Combined, the two measures indicate that 64 percent of the U.S. public want a verdict before voting takes place.

Only 11 percent of voters believe the trial should be delayed until after the election, which Trump has advocated for, while 25 percent indicated it doesn’t matter to them when the trial is held.

Regarding their actual views of Trump’s actions, a plurality of 45 percent, believe Trump acted illegally in his efforts to remain president after the previous election results were tallied. Only 23 percent believe he did nothing wrong.

The Trump legal team’s delay tactics are transparent to most legal experts — by stalling, if Trump wins the 2024 race and becomes president again, he can appoint an attorney general to the DOJ who will likely drop all federal charges against him, or he can try to create yet another constitutional crisis by attempting to pardon himself.

Delaying the trial and avoiding a verdict — particularly a conviction — is essential for Trump, politically speaking. Other polls, including a Morning Consult poll from late January, show that swing voters may sour on him if he is found guilty in any of the four criminal cases he’s facing.

According to that Morning Consult poll, 53 percent say they’d be unwilling to vote for Trump upon conviction on any of the charges he faces. Only 40 percent of voters say they’d be willing to vote for him still if he’s convicted.

Trump can still run for president even if he’s been found guilty of a crime or even sent to prison. The likelihood of that happening before the 2024 election is very slim, as Trump will likely appeal any guilty verdict he may receive.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.