The formal whistleblower complaint by a U.S. official that Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire has refused to turn over to Congress was reportedly sparked by an alarming “promise” President Donald Trump made to a foreign leader in recent weeks.
The Washington Post, citing two anonymous former U.S. officials familiar with the matter, reported late Wednesday that Trump’s promise “was regarded as so troubling that it prompted an official in the U.S. intelligence community to file a formal whistleblower complaint with the inspector general for the intelligence community.”
“It was not immediately clear which foreign leader Trump was speaking with or what he pledged to deliver, but his direct involvement in the matter has not been previously disclosed,” according to the Post. “It raises new questions about the president’s handling of sensitive information and may further strain his relationship with U.S. spy agencies. One former official said the communication was a phone call.”
It’s approximately the worst case scenario—what the administration is seeking to suppress is an intelligence whistleblower complaint involving the President and a foreign leader, WaPo reports. Of course it is. https://t.co/6GZLfnx8VL
— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) September 19, 2019
Though it revealed for the first time the president’s direct involvement in the whisteblower complaint that has sparked frenzied speculation and public scrutiny by members of Congress, the Post’s bombshell story may have raised more questions than it answered.
Warning that Trump will likely attempt to distract from the whistleblower story “with his usual theatrics and tweets,” New York Times contributor Wajahat Ali asked on Twitter: “What was the alleged ‘promise’ Trump made? Who did he make it to? What was the agreement? How come the WH and DOJ [have] interfered in this process?”
The Post noted that the president spoke or met with at least five foreign leaders in the weeks preceding the whistleblower complaint, including Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, Emir of Qatar Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte.
According to the Post, Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson received the whistleblower complaint on Aug. 12, deemed it both “credible and urgent,” and submitted it to Maguire.
“By law, Maguire is required to transmit such complaints to Congress within seven days,” the Post reported. “But in this case, he refrained from doing so after turning for legal guidance to officials at the Justice Department.”
Maguire’s refusal to hand over the complaint to Congress, at the apparent advice of the Justice Department, sparked concerns that the acting intelligence chief and DOJ are subverting the law to protect the president.
John Dean, who served as White House counsel for President Richard Nixon, said the story “feels potentially very big.”
“The Machiavellian Mr. Barr is protecting Trump from a whistleblower complaint, it’s unprecedented,” wrote Dean. “This may take impeachment in a totally new direction.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.