Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump’s Attack on Agencies’ Independence Aims to Spark Legal Fight, Experts Say

Robert Weissman of Public Citizen called the executive order “illegal” and “profoundly dangerous.”

President Donald Trump speaks as he signs a series of executive orders in the Oval Office at the White House on February 10, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order aimed at bringing the nation’s independent agencies — including the Federal Trade Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission — under his control, a sweeping power grab that’s expected to spark a legal fight with enormous stakes for the country.

The new executive order, titled “Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies,” laments that previous administrations “have allowed so-called ‘independent regulatory agencies’ to operate with minimal presidential supervision” and states that, going forward, “the president and the attorney general, subject to the president’s supervision and control, shall provide authoritative interpretations of law for the executive branch.”

The order goes on to require that “all executive departments and agencies” — including those granted some independence from the presidency by Congress — “shall submit for review all proposed and final significant regulatory actions to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Executive Office of the President before publication in the Federal Register.”

OIRA is part of the Office of Management and Budget, which is run by Project 2025 architect and far-right extremist Russell Vought.

In a fact sheet released alongside the order, the White House specifically names the FTC, the SEC, and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as agencies it claims have “exercised enormous power over the American people without presidential oversight.”

The new order exempts from its far-reaching mandates the “monetary policy functions of the Federal Reserve.”

Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, said in a statement that the executive order marks an “illegal” attempt to “shield corporations from accountability and centralize more power with Trump and his minions.”

“This is a profoundly dangerous idea for the nation’s health, safety, environment, and economy — and for our democracy,” he added. “Congress made independent agencies independent of the White House for good reason.”

Weissman noted that the independence of agencies such as the FTC and SEC is “designed to enable them to perform these duties without undue political pressure from giant corporations, the super-rich and the super-connected.”

“Trump’s EO would dissolve that independence and put the agencies under Trump’s thumb, ensuring they turn a blind eye to wrongdoing by favored corporations and leave consumers and investors out to dry,” Weissman continued. “Not incidentally, both the FTC and SEC have ongoing investigations or enforcement actions against companies owned by Elon Musk. Americans should understand exactly what this is: A giant gift to the corporate class and a Trumpian power grab.”

The Washington Post reported that Trump’s order sets the stage for “a potential Supreme Court fight that could give him significantly more power over those agencies’ decisions, budgets, and leadership.” Trump has already trampled decades of legal precedent by firing protected officials without cause, including the former chair of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

“Courts have blocked or limited the reach of some of Trump’s executive actions, but legal observers expect that the conservative-dominated Supreme Court may be open to broadening presidential power in at least some of the cases,” the Post observed. “The justices are already considering a case regarding the scope of Trump’s power over independent agencies, and Tuesday’s executive order seems sure to prompt additional legal challenges.”

Deborah Pearlstein, a constitutional scholar at Princeton University, told the newspaper that the White House is “deliberately teeing up a major question of constitutional law that will go to the Supreme Court for review.”

The Supreme Court is currently controlled by a right-wing supermajority that includes three Trump-appointed justices.

Prior to Trump’s order, the U.S. Justice Department — headed by Attorney General Pam Bondi — indicated that it would no longer defend the independence of the NLRB, FTC, and other agencies and would ask the Supreme Court to reverse precedent that has shielded independent agency leaders from termination without cause.

Reuters reported that “about two dozen companies, including Amazon and Elon Musk’s SpaceX, have filed lawsuits since last year claiming the president should have the power to fire NLRB members at will.”

“Several companies sued by the FTC have filed similar challenges against that agency,” the outlet added. “They include Meta Platforms, Walmart, and Cigna’s Express Scripts.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have until midnight tonight to add 132 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.