Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Won’t Testify at His Own Impeachment Trial, Spokesman Says

In rejecting an invitation for Trump to testify, his lawyers called the impeachment trial itself “unconstitutional.”

Then-President Donald Trump stops to talk to reporters as he walks to board Marine One and depart from the South Lawn at the White House on January 12, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

Donald Trump’s lawyers said that the former president will not testify in his impeachment trial next Tuesday.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland), the lead House impeachment manager, had sent a letter to Trump Thursday asking the former president to provide testimony, either in person at the trial or at a separate location, between February 8 and 11.

Trump’s lawyers, Bruce Castor and David Schoen, responded to Raskin’s request later that day.

“Your letter only confirms what is known to everyone: you cannot prove your allegations against the 45th President of the United States, who is now a private citizen.”

Trump spokesman Jason Miller also responded to the request from Raskin. While the former president’s lawyers didn’t directly state that Trump wouldn’t be a witness in his own trial, Miller was much more direct.

“The President will not testify in an unconstitutional proceeding,” Miller said.

Raskin’s letter noted how Trump’s lawyers filed a legal brief two days ago for the impeachment trial that contradicted a number of “factual allegations” that were laid out in the single article of impeachment made against him for inciting a mob of his own supporters last month to descend upon the Capitol, where they forcibly breached the building.

“You have thus attempted to put critical facts at issue notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense,” Raskin wrote. “In light of your disputing these factual allegations, I write to invite you to provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021.”

The request from Raskin was not binding. However, should Trump decline the request, Raskin wrote in the letter, it would give him and other impeachment managers the right to suggest in the trial that his refusal “supports a strong adverse inference regarding [Trump’s] actions.”

The comments from his lawyers and from his spokesman match arguments made earlier this week by Trump’s legal team — that the impeachment trial he was set to face was improper.

“As you certainly know, there is no such thing as a negative interference in this unconstitutional proceeding,” they wrote.

Trump’s legal brief, submitted on Tuesday, stated that he could not be indicted in a Senate impeachment trial because the “Senate lacks jurisdiction” to try a former president — an argument rejected by several legal experts. Trump’s legal team also argued that Trump wasn’t responsible for inciting his supporters to attack the Capitol because he is protected by his First Amendment constitutional rights “to express his belief that the election results were suspect.”

“Insufficient evidence exists upon which a reasonable jurist could conclude that the 45th president’s statements were accurate or not, and he therefore denies they were false,” his lawyers claimed.

There is no evidence to substantiate claims that the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent.

House impeachment managers soundly rejected Trump’s claim that his First Amendment rights warranted him the ability to speak without consequence. “Rights of speech and political participation mean little if the President can provoke lawless action if he loses at the polls,” they wrote in their filing on Tuesday. “The 1st Amendment does not constrain Congress from removing an official whose expression makes him unfit to hold or ever again occupy federal office.”

Trump’s impeachment trial is set to begin next week. For Trump to be indicted, it will require a two-thirds vote of the Senate. If every member of the Democratic caucus finds him guilty, at least 17 Republicans will have to join them in order to disbar Trump from holding office again.

The public is currently split on the issue of whether the Senate should indict Trump, with slightly more people preferring a guilty verdict for Trump. A Quinnipiac University poll released this week found that 50 percent of Americans want Trump to be convicted, while 45 percent say they hope that he isn’t.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.