Donald Trump’s lawyers said that the former president will not testify in his impeachment trial next Tuesday.
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland), the lead House impeachment manager, had sent a letter to Trump Thursday asking the former president to provide testimony, either in person at the trial or at a separate location, between February 8 and 11.
Trump’s lawyers, Bruce Castor and David Schoen, responded to Raskin’s request later that day.
“Your letter only confirms what is known to everyone: you cannot prove your allegations against the 45th President of the United States, who is now a private citizen.”
Trump spokesman Jason Miller also responded to the request from Raskin. While the former president’s lawyers didn’t directly state that Trump wouldn’t be a witness in his own trial, Miller was much more direct.
“The President will not testify in an unconstitutional proceeding,” Miller said.
Raskin’s letter noted how Trump’s lawyers filed a legal brief two days ago for the impeachment trial that contradicted a number of “factual allegations” that were laid out in the single article of impeachment made against him for inciting a mob of his own supporters last month to descend upon the Capitol, where they forcibly breached the building.
“You have thus attempted to put critical facts at issue notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense,” Raskin wrote. “In light of your disputing these factual allegations, I write to invite you to provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021.”
The request from Raskin was not binding. However, should Trump decline the request, Raskin wrote in the letter, it would give him and other impeachment managers the right to suggest in the trial that his refusal “supports a strong adverse inference regarding [Trump’s] actions.”
The comments from his lawyers and from his spokesman match arguments made earlier this week by Trump’s legal team — that the impeachment trial he was set to face was improper.
“As you certainly know, there is no such thing as a negative interference in this unconstitutional proceeding,” they wrote.
Trump’s legal brief, submitted on Tuesday, stated that he could not be indicted in a Senate impeachment trial because the “Senate lacks jurisdiction” to try a former president — an argument rejected by several legal experts. Trump’s legal team also argued that Trump wasn’t responsible for inciting his supporters to attack the Capitol because he is protected by his First Amendment constitutional rights “to express his belief that the election results were suspect.”
“Insufficient evidence exists upon which a reasonable jurist could conclude that the 45th president’s statements were accurate or not, and he therefore denies they were false,” his lawyers claimed.
There is no evidence to substantiate claims that the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent.
House impeachment managers soundly rejected Trump’s claim that his First Amendment rights warranted him the ability to speak without consequence. “Rights of speech and political participation mean little if the President can provoke lawless action if he loses at the polls,” they wrote in their filing on Tuesday. “The 1st Amendment does not constrain Congress from removing an official whose expression makes him unfit to hold or ever again occupy federal office.”
Trump’s impeachment trial is set to begin next week. For Trump to be indicted, it will require a two-thirds vote of the Senate. If every member of the Democratic caucus finds him guilty, at least 17 Republicans will have to join them in order to disbar Trump from holding office again.
The public is currently split on the issue of whether the Senate should indict Trump, with slightly more people preferring a guilty verdict for Trump. A Quinnipiac University poll released this week found that 50 percent of Americans want Trump to be convicted, while 45 percent say they hope that he isn’t.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy