Donald Trump is in no danger of losing his core base of support within the Republican Party anytime soon. But a new survey suggests there may be someone else who is preferred by a larger proportion of GOP voters when it comes to who should be the party’s nominee for president in 2024.
A straw poll conducted at the Western Conservative Summit in Denver, Colorado, over the weekend asked participants, 371 of whom responded, to say if they approved or disapproved of a number of potential Republican candidates for president. Trump received the approval of more than 71 percent of the participants who took part. But Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis came in first place, with 74.12 percent saying they’d approve of his candidacy if he won the nomination.
Both men held wide margins over the other proposed names, with Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas a distant third with a 42.86 percent approval rating among poll participants.
The poll’s results do not necessarily mean that more Republican voters prefer DeSantis over Trump, just that more agree he’d be a better pick than the former president. It’s highly likely that if the two were in a primary against each other for the party’s nomination in 2024 Trump would win, according to other polling figures that have been published recently. Indeed, a Politico/Morning Consult survey conducted last month found that around half of GOP voters would choose Trump as their first pick for the nomination, with just 7 percent saying DeSantis was their top choice.
Still, the Western Conservative Summit poll indicates that Republicans are aligned on the type of candidate they would like to have run for president. And that type of candidate is decidedly Trumpian, no matter which of the top two choices voters end up picking.
Some have opined that DeSantis is very similar to Trump, and there are certainly signs that confirm such reasoning. The Florida governor has imposed decidedly Trumpian laws on voting, including signing a law that restricts mail-in voting and criminalizes the handing out of food and water to voters waiting in long lines on election day. DeSantis took a Trumpian approach to the pandemic, too, refusing to impose shutdowns and not enforcing the wearing of masks or social distancing protocols to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Indeed, DeSantis signed a law early in May that made it illegal for municipalities to have mask rules enforced within their own jurisdictions.
If he doesn’t run for president in 2024, DeSantis would likely be on Trump’s short-list of potential vice presidential candidates. Trump himself has said he’s considering DeSantis as a possible running mate, as he ponders his own run. But while DeSantis’s Trump-like actions make him a strong candidate in Republican circles, both he and Trump are likely to face serious difficulties in mounting a win nationally among all voters three years from now.
A Quinnipiac University poll published late last month asked respondents whether they’d want to support candidates who mostly agree with Trump or those who mostly disagree with him. Among Republicans, 85 percent said they wanted someone who mostly agreed with Trump. But when the question was asked of all voters, only 39 percent said they wanted someone aligned with Trump’s positions, with 53 percent saying they would prefer voting for someone who mostly disagrees with his views.
Within that same poll, only 30 percent of respondents said they wanted to see Trump run again in 2024. Two-thirds of voters (66 percent) said they hoped he wouldn’t run again.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.