Private control over public goods (i.e., privatization) comes in many forms. Higher education is a classic example of a public good – it shouldbe available to as many people as possible. Yet, as Adam Davidson reveals in an article published last week in The New York Times Magazine, rising tuition, reduced public spending, and market logic are increasingly reshaping our higher education system.
What makes higher education a public good? Our values, our national health (not just economic, but our cultural richness, and the stability and security of families), and because we say so. Democracy means we decide what makes a good society.
The bottom line is, as Davidson writes, “[e]very American benefits when every other American has access to as much schooling as he or she wants. When accessibility to higher education declines we all end up paying for it.”
He describes it perfectly:
“Education can have enormous personal benefits for those who acquire it, but it also has external benefits to the rest of society. Education exerts something of a multiplier effect; it transforms not only the lives of the educated but of those around them as well. Workers with more education are more productive, which makes companies more profitable and the overall economy grow faster. There are also significant noneconomic benefits. Educated populations tend to be healthier, more stable and more engaged in their civic institutions and democratic debate.”
Public underinvestment in higher education doesn’t happen by accident. Harvard professor Lawrence Katz pointed out in a recent paper that “states that had elite private schools in the 1890s are less likely to have developed … strong, upper tier public schools.” The reason: powerful private schools lobbied to keep public institutions underfunded.
Some more facts from Davidson’s article:
-
“Since the 1980s most states have decreased their per-student spending on public education. In the 2001-2002 school year, public schools received from 44 percent to 62 percent of their funding from state governments. Only a decade later, those levels had decreased to27 percent to 51 percent. On average, states have lowered their per-student funding by 25 percent over the last 15 years. Some – Louisiana, Wisconsin, Kansas and Arizona – have cut their support sharply in the past few years.”
-
‘Small government’ politicians see spending on higher education as a juicy target. For example, Governor Scott Walker has cut $250 million from Wisconsin’s budget for higher education.
Public universities have increasingly acted like private universities with higher tuitions and corporate donations that fund corporate-friendly research and programs. For example, according to a recent New York Times investigative report, some scientists at the University of Florida recently took funding from corporate giant Monsanto to intervene with the USDA on the GMO industry’s behalf.
Rather than the public good it should be, higher education has become a market product accessible to those who can afford it, harming America in the process.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.