A Republican state lawmaker is seeking to dissolve the city of Austin, Texas — a jurisdiction that frequently elects progressive-leaning lawmakers — through legislation that would turn the municipality into a district overseen by the state government.
State Rep. Jared Patterson (R) introduced House Bill 714 last week (along with a constitutional amendment) that would replace the capital city’s government with the District of Austin. Under Patterson’s bill, the jurisdiction would still have elections for local leaders, but their decision-making would be subject to oversight by the state legislature and the state lieutenant governor.
The bill is viewed as being too extreme to get passed, but the submission of Patterson’s proposal is nothing new — Republican lawmakers have for years concocted similar ideas for ways to disrupt Austin’s progressive style of city management. In recent years, the state legislature has clashed with the city on a number of ideas, often passing new legislative bills in order to punish Austin’s government — for example, passing a bill that lessened funding for cities in the state that cut police budgets, as Austin had done in 2020.
Though it is unlikely to pass, the bill could see higher interest from state legislative lawmakers, as Republicans made modest gains in the statehouse, which they already had majority control over, during this year’s midterms. The GOP gained one seat in the state House of Representatives, increasing their majority to 86 seats (versus 64 held by Democratic lawmakers); and in the Senate, Republicans gained at least one seat, with another seat still yet to be decided. Incumbent Gov. Greg Abbott, also a Republican, won reelection to his post as well in his contest against Democratic nominee Beto O’Rourke.
In a set of tweets announcing his legislation, Patterson described Austin as a “failed” city with high taxes and crime — a common (and exaggerated) midterm talking point of Republicans.
Patterson’s bill won’t be considered until the state legislature reconvenes in January. City lawmakers throughout the state have condemned the proposal as an attempt to undemocratically control people’s lives, even in areas where progressive lawmakers are duly elected by the people.
“This brazen attack on [local control] is not only an attempt to take away the will of the voters in Austin, but is a prime example of the waste of time and resources that occurs every session,” Dallas City Councilman Adam Bazaldua said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.