Skip to content Skip to footer

Texas Judge Sought to Hide Abortion Pill Hearing From Public to Prevent Protests

The highly unusual move is the latest in far right judges’ current streak of judicial activism.

The abortion drug Mifepristone, also known as RU486, is pictured in an abortion clinic February 17, 2006, in Auckland, New Zealand.

A Donald Trump-appointed judge who could effectively enact a federal ban on the abortion medication mifepristone privately sought to prevent the public from knowing that a hearing for the case was scheduled in order to prevent protests ahead of the hearing.

District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, one of the most conservative anti-abortion federal judges in the U.S., recently scheduled the first hearing for the case for Wednesday — but planned to delay putting the hearing on the public docket until late Tuesday, according to sources cited by The Washington Post.

In a conference call with attorneys on Friday, Kacsmaryk said that he didn’t want the hearing to be “disrupted” by possible protests and other forms of dissent, sources said. He asked the attorneys not to share information about the case before Tuesday.

Kacsmaryk’s move is highly unusual, experts say, and a stunning show of a judge attempting to insert opacity in the judicial system and escape public oversight. Public notice is a crucial element of the judicial system and is especially important in cases where millions of Americans could be affected; some experts have suggested that seeking to block public notice of hearings should disqualify Kacsmaryk from being able to serve.

Carolina Kitchener, one of the reporters who uncovered the news of Kacsmaryk’s move for The Washington Post, noted that delaying notice of the hearing until Tuesday would likely mean that protesters coming from outside of Amarillo, Texas, where the case will be heard, would not be able to make it in time to voice their opposition — and journalists would also have an extremely hard time getting to the court in time to report on the hearing.

“An important piece of this: Amarillo is really hard to get to. A five hour drive or a flight from Dallas. If Kacsmaryk had publicized this Tuesday night, as planned, very few journalists or advocates from other states would have been able to show up Wednesday morning,” Kitchener wrote on Twitter. “When I went last month, it took me nine hours door to door from NYC.”

The case could have huge ramifications. Kacsmaryk is expected to rule that the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of mifepristone in 2000 never should have happened, ordering the agency to revoke the decision. Though federal judges don’t have power to slash the FDA’s decisions this way, the FDA, perhaps seeking to avoid legal troubles, could choose to comply with the order, law professors recently noted in Slate.

If this happens, mifepristone could be banned from distribution across the country — an outcome that abortion advocates say would be “catastrophic.” Mifepristone is the first of two drugs used in many abortion procedures, in conjunction with misoprostol. Mifepristone is also used for many other crucial procedures and treatments other than abortion, like cervical ripening for insertion of IUDs, a form of birth control, and to treat Cushing’s syndrome, a hormonal disorder.

Medication abortions, which are the most common form of abortion, will still be able to be administered through misoprostol alone, but research has shown that the misoprostol-only method is less effective than the two-drug combination, and can have more side effects, like cramping and bleeding.

If Kacsmaryk does rule to overturn the FDA’s approval of mifepristone, it would likely be an unprecedented decision that could have wide-ranging effects over the federal government’s ability to regulate other drugs, experts say. This could be extremely dangerous, as far right activists have already been waging judicial attacks on medications like HIV prevention drug PrEP because of its disproportionate effect in saving lives in the LGBTQ community.

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $125,000 in one-time donations and to add 1400 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy