A national study published by JAMA Health Forum found that there was an abrupt surge in permanent sterilization procedures among young adults ages 18 through 30 after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling, which reversed the constitutional right to an abortion.
“If options for avoiding pregnancy and/or avoiding carrying pregnancies to term are severely limited, as has happened in 21 states since Dobbs, many patients will choose permanent ways to avoid this risk, rather than relying on less effective or less permanent methods,” Sarah W. Prager, MD, a professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Washington School of Medicine, told Healthline.
Following the Dobbs ruling, researchers observed an abrupt increase of 58 sterilization procedures for women, averaging around 5.31 procedures per month per 100,000 individuals. This marks an almost twofold increase from the prior rate of 2.84 procedures per month for women.
“Findings from this research highlight the indirect effects of Dobbs on the reproductive autonomy of young people,” said lead study author Dr. Jackie Ellison, assistant professor of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health.
While men experienced an overall increase of 27 procedures, there wasn’t a significant rise in monthly procedures.
“Choosing permanent contraception at a young age reflects lack of confidence in avoiding carrying an unintended pregnancy to term, and policy changes like Dobbs restrict options for all pregnancy-capable people, likely increasing a sense of urgency around eliminating possibilities of unwanted pregnancies,” Prager told Healthline.
Despite tubal ligations being up to six times more costly than vasectomies, as well as being more invasive and challenging to reverse, the increase in procedures among female patients was twice as high as that among male patients.
“The major difference in patterns of these two procedures likely reflects the fact that young women are overwhelmingly responsible for preventing pregnancy and disproportionately experience the health, social, and economic consequences of abortion bans,” Ellison said in a news release.
During the first six months of 2023, a different study released by the IZA Institute of Labor Economics revealed that states with abortion restrictions experienced a rise in childbirth rates compared to states where abortion remains legal.
“It’s important that people have access to their preferred methods of contraception and that these preferences aren’t constrained by a climate of reduced support for people’s overall reproductive freedom,” Megan Kavanaugh, principal research scientist at the Guttmacher Institute, said in a statement shared with Healthline.
In addition to 43 states having restricted abortion after a certain point in pregnancy and 14 states outright banning the procedure, women of reproductive age have also reported increased difficulties and/or delays in accessing their preferred contraception after Dobbs.
“We do have evidence at the population level in select states that people are experiencing increased barriers to accessing their preferred contraceptive methods since Dobbs, so we need to continue to monitor how these access barriers might be impacting people’s ability to actually obtain their preferred methods,” Kavanaugh told Healthline.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.