Skip to content Skip to footer

Seven Native American Tribes Have Banned Kristi Noem From Entering Their Lands

Noem talked down to Native American parents in the state, and falsely accused tribes of harboring Mexican cartels.

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem looks on as she testifies during a House Agriculture hearing at the Longworth House Office Building on March 20, 2024, in Washington, D.C.

The Crow Creek Sioux Tribe in central South Dakota announced this week that it would bar Republican Gov. Kristi Noem following a series of inept government actions and disrespectful comments she made toward Native Americans.

The vote on Tuesday marks the seventh time a tribe in the state that has barred Noem from entry to enter their lands. Only two tribes haven’t issued similar bans, though at least one of those two is considering it.

The Crow Creek Sioux Tribe listed several grievances with Noem, including comments in March in which she said that Native American children in the state “don’t have any hope” because they “don’t have parents who show up and help them.” The tribe also took issue with Noem’s “failure to act” during the last two years of winter storms, which led to nine deaths on the Rosebud Reservation alone in the 2022-23 season. She has also accused the tribes of harboring undocumented immigrants, including Mexican drug cartels, on their lands, claiming without evidence that “some tribal leaders” were “personally benefiting” from them.

“We do not have cartels on the reservations. We have cartel products, like guns and drugs. But they pass over state highways getting to the reservation,” Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Chairman Peter Lengkeek said to NPR, following the vote. “So, putting us all together like that and saying that all tribes are involved in this really shows to the ignorance of the governor’s office.”

“The people voted unanimously to ban her along with the tribal council for her derogatory remarks about the tribes and cartels, and about the remarks she made about the children being nobodies their whole lives because of the parents,” said tribal council member Kyle Loudner, speaking to The Dakota Scout about the vote.

Noem’s comments against the tribes in her state reflect a Trumpian rhetoric, with which she is attempting to sound “tough” on issues of immigration while also issuing xenophobic statements against nonwhite people. Racism in the state, particularly against Native Americans, has been a consistent problem both during and before Noem’s tenure.

Up until a few weeks ago, before revelations about unnecessarily killing a dog and other pets were included in her recently published autobiography, Noem was considered a short-list contender to become former President Donald Trump’s 2024 vice presidential running mate.

The likelihood of her nomination is now very small, given how she has refused to apologize for admitting to killing pets and has actually doubled down on trying to justify it, despite widespread condemnation.

Trump partially came to Noem’s defense, saying in reaction to those reports, “We all have bad weeks.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.