The Senate Judiciary Committee narrowly passed a bill
Thursday to extend several controversial provisions of the USA Patriot Act,
the counterterrorism law hastily drafted in the aftermath of 9/11.
The parts of the Patriot Act set to expire December 31 that the panel voted
to extend until 2013 included roving wiretaps, which authorizes the FBI to target
individuals using multiple phone numbers; the “lone wolf” provision,
which targets individuals who are not connected to terrorist groups and has
thus far never been used; and, perhaps the most controversial, section 215 orders
, otherwise known as the “library records” provision, which allows
the FBI to access individuals’ personal records via National Security Letters
(NSLs).
In March 2007, Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine issued a 200-page
report documenting FBI abuses of National Security Letters. Fine testified
before Congress during the time that the FBI may have violated the law 3,000
times since 2003 by improperly using NSLs to collect information on US citizens.
The bill – the USA Patriot Act Sunset Extension Act – was co-sponsored by Judiciary
Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy and committee member Dianne Feinstein, who
also chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, and passed was passed by a vote
of 11 to 8. It will now be sent to the full Senate for consideration and will
likely be the subject of fierce debate by conservative lawmakers, who believe
it does not go far enough in allowing law enforcement to combat terrorism, and
liberal Democrats, who say it tramples on privacy rights.
Civil liberties’ advocates and some Democratic lawmakers were sharply critical
of the legislation as it currently stands and criticized their colleagues for
supporting it.
“What was most upsetting was the apparent willingness of too many members
to defer completely to behind the scenes complaints from the FBI and the Justice
Department, even though the [Obama] administration has yet to take a public
position on any of the improvements that I and other senators have proposed,”
said Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin). “I am left scratching my head trying
to understand how a committee controlled by a wide Democratic margin could support
the bill it approved today …”
Michael Macleod-Ball, acting director of the ACLU Washington legislative office,
said the bill “was a missed opportunity for the Senate Judiciary Committee
to right the wrongs of the Patriot Act and stand up for Americans’ Fourth Amendment
rights.”
“We are disappointed that further changes were not made to ensure Americans’
civil liberties would be adequately protected by this Patriot Act legislation,”
Macleod-Ball added. “The meager improvements made during this markup will
certainly be overshadowed by allowing so many horrible amendments to be added
to an already weak bill. Congress cannot continue to make this mistake with
the Patriot Act again and again. We urge the Senate to adopt amendments on the
floor that will bring this bill in line with the Constitution.”
The Advocacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation said, “instead
of adding more protections to the bill, [the Judiciary Committee] voted to accept
seven Republican amendments [and removed] the few civil liberties protections
left in the bill after it was already watered down at last
Thursday’s
Committee meeting. Surprisingly and disappointingly, most of those amendments
were recommended to their Republican sponsors by the Obama Administration.”
Indeed. One Republican Senator, Jeff Sessions, of Alabama, the Washington Post
reported
“won approval for a package of amendments, intended to meet the concerns
of intelligence officials and the administration, that would limit the scope
of newly crafted privacy protections for library records, preserve the government’s
ability to maintain secrecy concerning NSLs in sensitive investigations, and
keep current law in place by not imposing unprecedented minimization requirements
on information.”
Senators who voted in favor of the bill are:
Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont
Herb Kohl, D-Wisconsin
Dianne Feinstein, D-California
Chuck Schumer, D-New York
Benjamin Cardin, D-Maryland
Sheldon Whitehouse, D-Rhode Island
Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota
Ted Kaufman, D-Delaware
Al Franken, D-Minnesota
Jon Kyl, R-Arizona
John Cornyn, R-Texas
Those who voted no:
Russ Feingold, D-Wisconsin
Dick Durbin, D-Illinois
Arlen Specter, D-Pennsylvania
Jeff Sessions, R-Alabama
Orin Hatch, R-Utah
Charles Grassley, R-Iowa
Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina
Tom Coburn, R-Oklahoma
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy