The highest ranking Congressman overseeing banking regulation met with Donald Trump in New York on Tuesday, after unveiling a plan to repeal much of Dodd-Frank.
House Financial Services Committee Chair Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) declined to go into the gritty details when asked about the meeting on Fox Business Channel. He said Trump “well-received the message” and is “interested in the policy.”
“I’m not going to go into the blow-by-blow,” he said.
Hensarling, who endorsed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) in the primary and is backing Trump in the general election, said he disagreed with many of the nominee’s statements. He wholeheartedly agreed with host Stuart Varney’s assertion, that Trump represents the country’s “only hope” of repealing Dodd-Frank.
Hensarling’s initiative would exempt banks from Dodd-Frank rules if they agreed to hold more cash in reserves, according to Reuters. It would also repeal the Volcker Rule, which prohibits banks from financing speculative trades with federally-insured consumer deposits.
The legislation would additionally scrap the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), a mutli-agency body created to determine whether financial firms are “systemically important,” and, therefore, “too big to fail” — too influential and wound-up in the banking system to collapse without a government bailout.
The designation requires banks to submit themselves to enhanced regulation, including a rule that requires them to detail how they would resolve themselves without government assistance, in the event of bankruptcy.
Federal regulators can declare these plans “not credible,” a ruling that forces them to either reformulate another outline or start downsizing in two years. In April, the Federal Reserve and FDIC said the plans, or “living wills” drafted by five major banks — Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, New York Mellon, and State Street — were “not credible.”
Hensarling’s plan would also restructure the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency that has attracted much wrath from conservatives.
This marks the first time that Hensarling has proposed a broad appeal of financial reform. Though he has chaired the House Financial Services Committee since 2013, the Republican “has only moved relatively narrow bills through his committee, rather than push a wholesale repeal of Dodd-Frank,” Roll Call noted last year. Hensarling joked Tuesday that he would be “only replacing 89.7 percent of Dodd-Frank,” not repealing it.
On Tuesday morning, a major advocate of Dodd-Frank, the CFPB, and financial regulation, generally speaking, hit out at Hensarling’s plan.
In a Senate Banking Committee hearing, Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) called the bill “a wet kiss for the Wall Street banks.”
“Apparently, Congressman Hensarling thinks that you can end ‘too big to fail’ simply from stopping regulators from calling firms ‘too big to fail,” Warren said of the FSOC proposal, specifically. “I don’t think that’s how it works.”
Warren also hit out at Hensarling for “sprinting toward Trump Tower” while top Republicans have distanced themselves from the nominee — for calling into question the impartiality of Gonzolo Curiel, a federal judge overseeing a lawsuit against Trump University, simply because he is Mexican.
“I get that the Republicans want unity right now,” Warren said. “But if unity means a marriage between Donald Trump’s toxic racism and Jeb Hensarling’s Wall Street giveaways, then I think they’d be better off with division.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.