Putting science-denier Senator Ted Cruz in charge of NASA’s funding oversight was never going to go well, and last week the Republican lawmaker really began flexing his muscles, claiming that NASA should focus only on space exploration and stop looking at more Earthly matters.
Until now, Cruz has surprised both his critics and his Tea Party faithful by being relatively quiet in his role as chair of the Senate Space, Science, and Competitiveness Subcommittee. However, during a budget meeting on Thursday, Cruz did seem to tip his hand when he suggested that NASA’s current reportage on Earth science is dull and that it was time to turn our attention back to the stars–and, presumably, away from what all those non-renewable sources of energy we keep burning are actually doing to our planet.
Taking aim at NASA’s requested $18.5 billion budget for fiscal year 2016, and attempting to rattle NASA Administrator Charles Bolden in the process, Cruz asked what NASA’s “core mission” has always been. For an agency that has all of the Earth and space as its domain, this wasn’t an easy thing for Bolden to pin down, but he gave it a reasonable go: “Our core mission from the very beginning has been to investigate, explore space and the Earth environment, and to help us make this place a better place.”
Cruz waved this away, saying: “Almost any American would agree that the core function of NASA is to explore space. That’s what inspires little boys and little girls across this country … and you know that I am concerned that NASA in the current environment has lost its full focus on that core mission.”
Apparently, learning about future megadroughts and current ground water loss–issues that could affect children in the future–aren’t the stuff dreams are made of and so presumably not worth funding.
Cruz went on to object to the fact that, according to his many, many charts, since President Obama was elected, NASA’s space exploration budget has decreased while its exploration of Earth has increased. This, Cruz argued, isn’t what the public expects of NASA.
Democratic lawmakers on the panel pointed out that while there may have been a reduction in space exploration spending across the board, that ignores the fact that the Obama administration has increased funds, for instance, for developing new technologies that will eventually aid space exploration and ignores Cruz’s own attempts to defund NASA in previous years.
Cruz disregarded this however and continued his attack. When Bolden began talking about NASA’s monitoring of water distribution in the Earth’s soil as a necessary look into not just water distribution but how our planet might be changing, Cruz offered what the media has taken to be the soundbite of the day: “I love our Texas soil,” said Cruz, “but that ain’t what makes NASA special.”
If Cruz thought his latest performance was a convincing one, however, scratch the thin veneer of badgering a NASA representative and what we really have is Cruz and his fellow Republicans trying to passive-aggressively bully NASA away from climate science. And that’s no wonder. Take Cruz’s previous comments on climate change and his apparent disdain for science: “You always have to be worried about something that is considered a so-called scientific theory that fits every scenario. Climate change, as they have defined it, can never be disproved, because whether it gets hotter or whether it gets colder, whatever happens, they’ll say, well, it’s changing, so it proves our theory.”
Cruz has previously joked that Al Gore must have got the global warming thing all wrong because of, well, snow and cold weather. He’s also flat out denied that the climate has changed. “The last 15 years, there has been no recorded warming,” he’s quoted as saying, despite the recorded warming NASA and other agencies have logged. “Contrary to all the theories that they are expounding, there should have been warming over the last 15 years. It hasn’t happened.“
It has. And it is still happening.
Cruz’s defenders have rushed to say that he never actually mentioned climate change during Thursday’s hearing–but that’s precisely the issue, isn’t it? Cruz denies climate change exists, and therefore is blind to all of NASA’s good work documenting its effects and projecting future problems.
What’s also fairly obvious though is that Cruz clearly doesn’t know how important understanding our own planet is to our space exploration goals. NASA’s looking at our climate, Earth’s rock composition, ozone layer depletion and more all helps us to understand what we are seeing when we look out into space. I quite agree that Congress should want a robust space mission, but defunding our attempts to understand our own planet out of science denial and partisan point scoring isn’t the way to do it. Instead, reducing military spending and putting that money toward scientific exploration is what is needed here.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy