A series of court decisions affecting congressional maps that were gerrymandered by Republican state legislatures following the latest decennial Census may tilt 2024 House elections toward Democrats, depending on how the cases are resolved.
Currently, the U.S. House of Representatives is comprised of 222 Republicans and 212 Democrats, with one seat in a Democratic-leaning district vacant. Assuming that district goes toward Democrats in an upcoming special election, the party would only have to win a net total of five additional seats in order to become the majority in that chamber of Congress.
Several experts noted that Republicans capitalized in the 2022 midterms by redrawing congressional maps in their favor — one analysis predicted in 2021 that, even if voting trends stayed the same from 2020 to 2022, Republicans’ gerrymandered redistricting would win them the House all on its own.
Elections analysts say that’s exactly what happened.
“It appears very likely that gerrymandering cost Dems the majority,” Stephen Wolf, a staff writer for Daily Kos, said after the 2022 midterms.
Republicans wouldn’t have won the House “if they hadn’t been able to gerrymander far more states than Dems,” Dave Wasserman, U.S. House editor of the Cook Political Report, said at the time.
A number of pending cases and court rulings in recent weeks, however, indicate that as many as a dozen House seats could switch back to Democratic-leaning if judges’ decisions finding the original GOP gerrymanders unlawful remain intact.
An Alabama-based federal appeals court, for example, which had previously ruled that maps drawn by that state’s Republican-controlled legislature were a racial gerrymander in violation of the Voting Rights Act, found earlier this month that lawmakers’ newly redrawn maps still failed to abide by the court’s mandate to create two districts in which Black voters in Alabama would be the majority. The court has tasked a special master with redrawing the maps instead, in consultation with a cartographer, to abide by the previous order.
Democrats are hoping the Alabama decision will be applied to a similar situation in Louisiana, resulting in an order for an additional district in Louisiana in which Black voters are the majority. A federal trial regarding Georgia’s congressional maps is also underway, which could result in an order to redraw the state’s political boundaries.
A state court judge in Florida also found that maps crafted by Florida’s Republican lawmakers violated a state constitutional provision protecting minority-access districts. The maps — which Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) advocated for — dismantled a district in which Rep. Al Lawson (D-Florida), a Black lawmaker, had been elected in three concurrent election cycles.
Democrats in New York are also hoping that a state court will determine that they will be able to redraw maps, as New York Republicans unexpectedly picked up three additional seats in 2022.
Overall, around a dozen or more House seats across six states could be remade, according to an analysis from Politico.
These court battles will likely be appealed and reexamined many times over. However, should they be resolved in time for the 2024 midterms, there’s a high probability they will have a huge impact on who will control the House beyond that election cycle.
Polling indicates that the midterms will be just as close as the presidential election is expected to be. According to an Economist/YouGov survey from last week, 43 percent of Americans say they plan to vote for whoever the Democratic candidate in their district will be, while 42 percent say they’ll back the Republican candidate — well within the poll’s margin of error of three points, indicating that the race is currently a statistical tie.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.