Skip to content Skip to footer

Our Environmental Past Holds the Solution to Our Climate Future

We agree that the benefits of sewage treatment outweigh its cost. We must treat climate pollution similarly.

Like human sewage, accumulated climate pollution in our atmosphere is a problem. How many of us would be alive today if we never treated human sewage?

Climate change is caused by climate pollution. When we discovered human sewage pollution was killing millions in the 19th century, we couldn’t stop making human sewage. What did we do? We treated the pollution.

Why aren’t we treating climate pollution? Is it because we can’t? When we discovered that human sewage pollution was killing millions, we thought it would be too expensive to put a toilet in every backyard. So, we made rules and laws that said costs didn’t matter, human life was more important. It wasn’t too expensive after all.

Then we discovered that too many outhouses were polluting the groundwater and millions were still dying. So we made new laws that said we must put a toilet in every home and dump the sewage in the river. We thought that would really be far too expensive. But it wasn’t.

When the dying continued, we realized we must treat the sewage. That was ridiculously expensive, so we thought. But the law said we must now treat human sewage pollution, and we did…. And it wasn’t expensive after all.

To make our environment safe, we did what we thought at first was too expensive. A billion toilets, two billion … and we continue to do this today, spending a half trillion dollars across the planet every year treating human sewage and drinking water to ensure a safe and healthy environment.

Now we have climate pollution. We are reducing climate pollution markedly because of alternative energy, efficiency and conservation. This trend will continue, as alternative energy costs are now lower than the cheapest fracked gas. The trend is so strong that global greenhouse gas emissions growth has been reduced significantly since 2012. This is something we couldn’t do with human sewage.

Like human sewage, accumulated climate pollution in our atmosphere is a problem. How many of us would be alive today if we never treated human sewage? How deep would it be?

Every year, the load of greenhouse gas pollution in our sky increases 2 percent. But warming for the last 10 years is increasing.

The Earth has warmed so much that natural emissions are increasing. Alaska is now emitting more greenhouse gases than it stores because of permafrost melt. US national forests are dying at a rate that is twice as fast as they are growing. The Amazon has flipped from a greenhouse gas sink to a greenhouse gas source three times since 2005, because of three ever-increasing intensity droughts greater than the 100-year drought in 2005, 2010 and 2016.

Peter Wadhams is one of the oldest practicing ice scientists and he has written a book about the Arctic, A Farewell to Ice. The Arctic is very likely the most climate change impacted area in the world. In the book, Wadhams says that because of warming, natural excess greenhouse gas emissions from Earth systems are now likely equal to all of mankind’s greenhouse gas emissions.

We have been warned for a generation that if we did not control climate pollution this would happen, and now it has. Controlling warming can no longer be done by simply reducing our civilization’s greenhouse gas emissions.

This is why we must take a play from our historic pollution treatment handbook. It’s time to start treating the accumulated climate pollution in our atmosphere.

Encouragingly, we are reducing greenhouse gas emissions even more rapidly than projected because the cost of alternative energy is falling faster than projected. Solar photovoltaic energy is less than half the price projected for today from 2009.

There’s lots of alarm because emissions have begun to grow again, but the reality is not as stark as the headlines. The last seven years, our total greenhouse gas emissions growth has only been 7 percent, whereas the seven years ending in 2008 was 25 percent – near 400 percent more. Still, we must reduce emissions faster.

But reducing emissions even to zero can no longer restore a healthy climate because Earth has taken over. This means that even if we quit fossil fuels completely, greenhouse gases will continue to grow. The only solution is to reduce the load of climate pollution in our sky that is causing the warming that has allowed Earth to take over.

So, we must treat the accumulated climate pollution in our sky just like we treated human sewage pollution. Some will undoubtedly say, “It will be too expensive.”

We won’t know for sure if it will be “too expensive” or not until we do it. To understand if it will be too expensive, we can also ask ourselves: What price is too expensive to restore a healthy climate? And we can also ask ourselves: Is it deep enough yet?

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy