A federal jury in Washington D.C. has convicted two members of the far right Oath Keepers — including founder Stewart Rhodes — of seditious conspiracy for their involvement in the attack on the U.S. Capitol building on January 6, 2021, and for their attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Three other members of the group were also convicted of obstruction of an official proceeding in Congress, but were found not guilty of seditious conspiracy. Both Rhodes and Kelly Meggs, the other member of the group who was convicted of seditious conspiracy, also received guilty verdicts related to disrupting an official proceeding.
Rhodes’s attorney said he plans to appeal the ruling, and a sentencing date has not yet been set. If upheld, Rhodes could face up to 20 years in prison for the seditious conspiracy conviction alone. The last successful seditious conspiracy conviction was nearly 20 years ago, in 1995.
Prosecutors in the case portrayed members of the Oath Keepers as feeling a “sense of entitlement” after Trump’s loss to President Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. That attitude led them to believe they could overturn the will of the American people, the prosecution said.
“They claimed to wrap themselves in the Constitution. They trampled it, instead. They claimed to be saving the Republic, but they fractured it, instead,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Nestler said during closing arguments.
Rhodes and others spouted violent rhetoric as they stormed the Capitol building — including suggesting that Trump’s loyalists attack Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-California).
Indeed, in a recording made days after the January 6 attack, Rhodes lamented that he and other Oath Keepers hadn’t employed more violence in order to keep Trump in power.
“My only regret is they should have brought rifles,” Rhodes said in the recording, which was obtained by the FBI and played to jurors by the DOJ. “We should have brought rifles. We could have fixed it right then and there. I’d hang fucking Pelosi from the lamppost.”
Some legal experts believe that Rhodes’s conviction indicates that similar charges could be levied against other key players in the January 6 attack— including former President Donald Trump. The DOJ is currently investigating Trump’s actions that day, and could feasibly move to charge him with a crime if evidence suggests that a case could be successful.
A direct connection between Rhodes’s actions and the former president hasn’t been established, although Rhodes did try several times to reach out to Trump to encourage him to take illegal actions to stay in power — including seizing voting machines to “prove” the election had been rife with fraud.
Notably, neither Trump nor Rhodes were inside the Capitol when the violence unfolded. The Oath Keepers’ founder was on the grounds of the Capitol building but not inside, directing other members who were in the Capitol while the violence erupted, and still received a seditious conspiracy conviction.
Lawmakers and commentators have asserted that Trump bears some legal responsibility for the violence that took place that day, since he directed a crowd of his loyalists — with full knowledge that some were armed with weapons — to express their complaints directly to Congress, ordering them to march to the Capitol that morning during a speech at his “Stop the Steal” rally. Former U.S. Attorney Barb McQuade has said that manslaughter charges for Trump should be considered.
Following Rhodes’s conviction on Tuesday, legal and political commentators hinted that the DOJ should consider charging Trump with seditious conspiracy.
“Stewart Rhodes being convicted for seditious conspiracy will be a wake-up call for a LOT of other January 6 defendants,” said lawyer Tristan Snell. “If the PLANNERS of January 6 can be convicted — and not just the foot soldiers — then EVERYONE involved is now at risk of serious felony convictions.”
Former FBI assistant director Frank Figliuzzi made a similar observation in a tweet directed at special counsel Jack Smith, who is overseeing the DOJ investigations involving Trump. Figliuzzi did not use Trump’s name in the tweet, but it was clear to whom he was referring.
“Dear Jack Smith; Someone can be charged and convicted for seditious conspiracy even when they weren’t there,” Figliuzzi said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.