After several days of avoidance, a lawsuit filed against Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Alabama) has finally been served by legal representatives of his legislative colleague Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-California), who alleges the staunch ally of former President Donald Trump played a significant role in inciting the attack on the U.S. Capitol building on January 6.
The lawsuit names Trump, his son Donald Trump Jr., the president’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani and Brooks as having played a part in riling up a crowd of hundreds that had gathered that morning to hear Trump speak. Those individuals, the suit also alleges, encouraged the mob of Trump loyalists to go to the Capitol while Congress was certifying the results of President Joe Biden’s Electoral College win.
“The peaceful transfer of power is a sacrament of American democracy,” the lawsuit states. “Donald Trump, his son Donald Trump Jr., his advisor Rudy Giuliani, and Congressman Mo Brooks, together with many others, defiled that sacrament through a campaign of lies and incendiary rhetoric which led to the sacking of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021.”
In finally receiving the complaint on Sunday, Brooks alleged that Swalwell’s legal team had unlawfully broken into his home, serving the paperwork to his wife in an inappropriate manner.
“Well, Swalwell FINALLY did his job, served complaint (on my WIFE),” Brooks wrote in a tweet. “HORRIBLE Swalwell’s team committed a CRIME by unlawfully sneaking INTO MY HOUSE & accosting my wife!”
Brooks’s claims — which, before being deleted and tweeted again, had initially included an image of a PIN number and a Gmail account password — have been refuted by Swalwell’s legal representatives.
“No one entered or even attempted to enter the Brooks’ house,” said Philip Andonian, an attorney for Swalwell who spoke to CNN on the matter. “That allegation is completely untrue. A process server lawfully served the papers on Mo Brooks’ wife, as the federal rules allow. This was after her initial efforts to avoid service.”
Andonian further blamed Brooks himself for the drama that was created around his wife being served the lawsuit instead of the congressman.
“Mo Brooks has no one but himself to blame for the fact that it came to this,” Andonian said. “We asked him to waive service, we offered to meet him at a place of his choosing. Instead of working things out like a civilized person, he engaged in a juvenile game of Twitter trolling over the past few days and continued to evade service. He demanded that we serve him. We did just that.”
A spokesperson for Brooks said that there is video evidence backing up the Alabama Republican’s claims. However, that video has not been made public as of yet.
According to Swalwell’s lawsuit, during Brooks’s speech on January 6, he encouraged Trump supporters who had gathered in front of the White House to “start taking down names and kicking ass.”
“Our ancestors sacrificed their blood, their sweat, their tears, their fortunes, and sometimes their lives, to give us, their descendants, an America that is the greatest nation in world history,” Brooks also said during his speech. “So I have a question for you: Are you willing to do the same? My answer is yes.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.