On Nov. 4, SOS Racisme, the French anti-racist NGO founded in 1984, published its report on companies that keep files on their employees’ ethnic identity and referred the case of Eurodisney to the courts. The entertainment industry giant requires that 80% of its temporary workers look “European.”
A “bombshell.” That is the word used by Patrick Karam, the inter-ministerial delegate for equal opportunity for French citizens from the overseas départements and territories, to describe the report submitted to him by the Fédération nationale des Maisons des potes and SOS Racisme. The subject is an explosive one: the practice of keeping files on the ethnic identity of people seeking housing or a job.
A law of which the police and the judges are ignorant.
It was while working on the case of Adecco Restauration, which was accused of classing its temporary workers by category, one of which was for persons from Africa, the French overseas départements and territories, and Haiti, that SOS Racisme began looking into one of Adecco’s customers, Eurodisney. As a result, at 9 a.m. yesterday SOS Racisme had bailiffs sent to Eurodisney’s offices. Indeed, the entertainment industry giant is described as a “main contracting party for racial discrimination,” since it was continually complaining that too many of Adecco’s temporary workers were colored or of North African origin. Whereas 80% of Adecco Restauration’s workers were “non-BWR” (that is, not “blue-white-red,” the colors of the French flag, a code term for “white”), for its part, Eurodisney set a maximum “quota” of 20% “non-BWR.” SOS Racisme then discovered a system of ethnic and racial file-keeping on job applicants on the Disney group’s Internet site. Applicants were required to choose their “country” from a list including France, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Réunion, French Polynesia, French Guyana and New Caledonia. The inhabitants of all these “countries” are French citizens.
When it looked at the 2007 Eurodisney balance sheet, SOS Racisme also discovered that employees were classed according to categories depending on their “nationality”: “Africa excluding North Africa, North Africa, other Caribbean, Europe (Western), including French…” As Samuel Thomas, president of the Fédération nationale des Maisons des potes and vice president of SOS Racisme pointed out, “this stigmatization of applicants from the French overseas départements and territories necessarily implies that there is a difference in the processing of applications made by these job applicants, who are all, nevertheless, French citizens.”
Eurodisney makes no attempt to conceal the fact that it has such a hiring policy and takes shelter behind a reference to its type of customer. Since most of its customers are Europeans, the company argues, its workers must also be mostly Europeans, even if they are not in direct contact with the customers. In the face of such blatant discrimination, SOS Racisme requested a court order from the president of the Meaux criminal court, obtained on October 28 and enforceable yesterday, to have a bailiff seize Eurodisney’s files on job applicants and on employees.
“No political will”
This procedure has proved to be essential in securing evidence of ethnic and racial file-keeping, which since 1978 has been punishable by five years’ imprisonment and a 300,000-euro-fine for individuals and a 1.5-million-euro fine for companies. This law is mainly honored in the breach, and for good reason: neither the police nor the judges know the law, to the point that the police have even refused to register complains and prosecutors and examining magistrates must be coaxed to take action. Similarly, the training on the subject that was to be offered at Magistrates School never saw the light of day. However SOS Racisme criticizes the laxism of the French national commission on information technology and freedom, which ought to have investigated the collection of data on an individual’s race and ethnicity, an activity which is theoretically forbidden. In reality, it has been SOS Racisme which has done the investigatory work to develop cases and collect evidence, has undertaken statistical analyses, has identified the employees who need to be heard by the examining magistrate and which has sought out the victims of these practices… Tomorrow, Patrick Karam will transmit the report to the inter-ministerial council on the French overseas départements and territories, which Nicolas Sarkozy will preside over. “The legal arsenal is both complete and adequate, what is lacking is the will,” Mr. Karam added.
Translated by Gene Zbikowski.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy