Advocates for both workers’ rights and climate policy are condemning Sen. Joe Manchin’s latest statements opposing provisions in the Build Back Better Act, the $1.75 trillion social spending and climate action package that has already been substantially weakened due largely to the right-wing Democrat’s objections to numerous anti-poverty and environmental measures.
Manchin’s most recent opposition is to tax incentives for electric vehicles made by American workers who are represented by unions.
At an event last week with officials from Toyota, whose plant workers have no union representation, the senator told Automotive News that incentivizing the purchase of electric vehicles from the only three auto companies with unions — the U.S.-based Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler — would be “un-American” and “wrong.”
“We shouldn’t use everyone’s tax dollars to pick winners and losers,” Manchin told the outlet at the event, where Toyota announced it would be investing $240 million in a non-union West Virginia plant to produce hybrid vehicles.
Toyota and other foreign-run auto companies have been lobbying against the provision, while United Auto Workers (UAW) has expressed support. If passed as it’s written now, the Build Back Better Act would provide purchasers of electric vehicles with a maximum tax credit of $7,500, and would add a $4,500 credit on top of that starting if the vehicle is manufactured by unionized workers.
As Earther reported Monday, the tax incentive could have a major impact on Americans’ ability to purchase vehicles not solely reliant on fossil fuels, as “price still remains the number one barrier in preventing new [electric vehicle] adoption.”
A 2020 survey by Ipsos Global showed that consumers would be willing to pay only 10% more for electric vehicles. The tax credit would bring down the cost of some electric vehicles by $12,000 to around $20,000, far below the current average cost of about $42,000.
President Joe Biden said last month that he wants workers and companies that benefit from the tax incentive to be “here in Michigan, not halfway around the globe.”
Ray Curry, president of the UAW, said last month the tax incentive “would be a win for auto manufacturing workers” while also encouraging “nonunion manufacturers to let their workers freely organize.”
Evidently, writer and attorney David Lurie said, “Manchin thinks being pro-labor is un-American.”
Joining Manchin in opposition to the tax incentive are Republican lawmakers including Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), whose states would also benefit from promoting the purchase of electric vehicles from non-union companies like Nissan and Tesla.
With the Senate evenly split between the Democrats and Republicans, Biden and Senate Democrats need Manchin’s support to pass the Build Back Better Act — a dynamic that’s directly resulted in the scrapping of provisions including the Clean Energy Performance Program and paid family and medical leave.
Now, said progressive campaign group Our Revolution, Manchin’s opposition to the tax credits is “inexcusable.”
“Our climate is running out of time — yet Manchin wants to stand in the way of affordable and sustainable solutions,” said the group. “Shame!”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.