Most in the U.S. question the legitimacy of so-called election “audits,” like the one happening in Maricopa County, Arizona, according to new polling from Monmouth University.
The poll asked respondents whether they felt audits of the 2020 presidential election, many of which are engaging in dubious activities, are “legitimate efforts to identify potential voting irregularities” or “partisan efforts to undermine valid election results.”
A majority of Americans, the poll found, felt the audits were partisan-based attempts to question the validity of the outcome of the presidential election, with 57 percent in the poll saying as much. Just one-third of respondents (33 percent) felt that the audits were legitimate actions intended to flesh out supposed voter or election fraud.
A plurality of respondents (40 percent) also said that these types of audits weaken democracy in the United States, while half that number (20 percent) said that they strengthen it. Thirty-five percent felt the audits had no impact one way or another.
On whether voter fraud itself was a widespread issue, only 37 percent in the poll said it was a “major problem.” Conversely, 50 percent of respondents said that voter disenfranchisement was the “major problem” — such as what’s occurring in a number of Republican-led states where bills intended to make voting more difficult have been introduced or passed.
There are plenty of reasons why voters might be skeptical of these so-called audits. The recounting and examination of ballots in Maricopa County, the most infamous audit currently being carried out, is managed by a security firm called Cyber Ninjas, which has zero experience conducting such election audits. The process has been rife with problems, with auditors at one point claiming that election data had been deleted by county officials before being handed over to them — when the real issue was one of competence, with the “auditors” themselves not knowing where such files typically resided and looking for them in the wrong places.
The company has subjected ballots to questionable examination processes, too, which may have actually damaged their integrity, and have failed to properly secure ballots, possibly in violation of federal law.
In the latest news regarding that audit, voting system data has been transported to a cabin in Bigfork, Montana, where the information will ostensibly be examined further. However, no details have been provided on what security measures are being taken to protect the election data.
In spite of the numerous missteps and embarrassing actions in Maricopa County, Republican lawmakers from various locations across the country have said that they may also conduct similar audits.
Pennsylvania Republican lawmakers traveled to the audit site in Arizona to see firsthand what was happening, and have signaled that they may soon begin their own audit as well. Wisconsin Republicans have also hired three former police officers, one of whom has conducted a dubious audit in the past (and whose evidence was thrown out of court proceedings after being deemed unreliable), to follow-up on supposed election fraud claims in that state, although no evidence of any kind of fraud whatsoever actually exists, elections officials have pointed out.
Such audits, despite being untrustworthy in many people’s eyes, could be used by Republicans to push for more restrictive voting measures in state legislatures across the country. But most in the U.S. want voting to become easier, not more difficult.
The same Monmouth University poll that asked about audits also queried respondents on election reforms. On voting by mail, 50 percent of respondents in the poll said the process should be easier, versus 39 percent who said it should be harder. Seventy-one percent of respondents also said that in-person early voting should be made easier, while only 16 percent said it should be more difficult. And when asked whether there should be national guidelines to allow mail-in voting and in-person voting in every state, 69 percent said they would support the idea, with only 25 percent opposed.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.