Skip to content Skip to footer

Israeli Minister Boasts About Blocking Ceasefire Deals as Media Blames Hamas

US media outlets and officials have repeatedly claimed Hamas is blocking a deal, despite reports to the contrary.

Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir (C), flanked by bodyguards, arrives at the scene of a reported stabbing attack in Holon in the southern suburb of Tel Aviv on August 4, 2024.

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir boasted on Tuesday about Israel blocking a Gaza ceasefire deal “time after time” for months now, even as Western media and U.S. officials have pinned blame for the lack of a deal on Hamas.

In a post on social media, Ben-Gvir said: “In the last year, using our political power, we managed to prevent this deal from going ahead, time after time.”

The remark is a show of what advocates for Palestinian rights and even many media reports have long said: that it is officials from Israel, not Hamas, that have acted as the main roadblock during ceasefire talks, despite the narrative adopted by pro-Israel U.S. entities in public.

Since U.S. and other officials began negotiating a ceasefire deal, Western media outlets and officials like President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken have repeatedly blamed Hamas negotiators for blocking deals for a ceasefire and hostage exchange.

As numerous reports showed over the course of the negotiations, these claims have been false from the start: Hamas quickly accepted the U.S.’s three-phased ceasefire proposal after Biden announced it last spring, while Israeli officials have continuously disrupted talks and outright said that they will not stop until they’ve achieved their ever-shifting, exterminationist war goals.

This week, Hamas and Israeli officials have said that a deal is imminent, with Hamas officials saying that it has a chance of going through as long as Israel doesn’t impose another one of their last-minute demands.

The details of the agreement are yet to be unveiled, but Israeli media has reported that the framework is similar to Biden’s proposal that Hamas had agreed to last year. It would involve the release of some of the roughly 100 Israeli captives still being held in Gaza, reports have found.

In his post, Ben-Gvir, one of the most extremist figures in Netanyahu’s far right government, threatened to resign from his position if a hostage deal is reached, calling it “horrific.”

He called on Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich to resign alongside him, which would weaken Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition in the government and make it more difficult for him to pass legislation in a time when the prime minister is already in a tenuous position politically. Netanyahu is also exposed legally, domestically with a corruption case, and internationally with the International Criminal Court’s case against him.

Ben-Gvir said that the ceasefire would amount to “surrender to Hamas” and “erases the war’s achievements” — even after Israel has destroyed nearly all of Gaza, corralled its residents into a tiny area deprived of basic needs, and laid the groundwork for annexation. “Even if we are in opposition, we will not bring down Netanyahu, but this move is our only chance to prevent its implementation,” Ben-Gvir said.

Smotrich announced his opposition to the deal on Monday, saying that now is the time for Israel to go even further in its assault and “occupy and cleanse the entire Strip.”

At least one Israeli minister has said that the cabinet is going to approve the ceasefire deal anyway and does not need their votes to go forward.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.