Skip to content Skip to footer

Israeli Hostages Killed by IDF Were Carrying White Flag, Israeli Military Says

One military expert, meanwhile, said that the “friendly fire” rate among the IDF is at an unprecedented level.

A picture taken in southern Israel near the border with the Gaza Strip on December 11, 2023, shows Israeli army soldiers taking position on a hill overlooking northern Gaza.

The three Israeli hostages who Israeli soldiers shot and killed last week had waved a white flag before they were killed, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) said on Saturday.

Three Israeli hostages were shirtless, carrying a makeshift white flag and traveling together near an IDF base in northern Gaza when soldiers identified them as “terrorists,” an IDF official said. Soldiers immediately opened fire, killing two of them immediately.

The third hostage took shelter in a nearby building and called for help in Hebrew. The commander of the battalion issued a ceasefire order, the official said, but soldiers opened fire on him nonetheless, killing him.

According to Ynet, soldiers only further examined the dead bodies because of their “western appearance” — one of the hostages killed had pale skin and red hair, unlike the majority of Palestinians.

Many advocates for Palestinian rights have pointed to the incident as evidence of IDF soldiers’ willingness to kill civilians without hesitation. It is a war crime to kill civilians indiscriminately in war.

The Israeli military chief of staff, Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi, said it is against the Israeli military’s protocol to shoot at people waving white flags. However, Israel has a long history of doing so; a Human Rights Watch investigation of the 2008 to 2009 Gaza War found that Israeli soldiers killed numerous Palestinians who were holding white flags, including children. Meanwhile, there is mounting evidence from the current massacre of Gaza and from decades past that Israeli forces routinely kill civilians, either mistakenly or on purpose, with impunity.

“Under the laws of war, people are presumed to be civilians,” Sari Bashi, Human Rights Watch program director, told The New York Times. “There needs to be strong information to suggest they are not before you can kill them.” Bashi pointed out that Israel opened fire on the hostages nearly immediately, and that they were only concerned with the fact that they had killed civilians because they were Israeli.

Meanwhile, the Israeli military has been especially reckless in their current assault of Gaza: Yagil Levy, an expert on civil-military studies at the Open University of Israel, told The Times that the “friendly fire” rate among Israeli soldiers is at an “unprecedented” level, with an estimated 20 percent of killings of Israeli soldiers being done by fellow IDF members so far.

Families of other hostages who have been detained by Hamas forces have said that the deaths only further their beliefs that Israel’s military should stop bombing Gaza and focus on hostage negotiations.

“Let them free all the Palestinian prisoners we have here, all the terrorists — what do I care,” Itzik Horn, whose adult sons were abducted by Hamas, told The New York Times, referring to the thousands of Palestinians who are being jailed by Israel, many without formal charges. “The most important thing isn’t to defeat Hamas. The only victory here is to bring back all the hostages.”

Adam Yekutieli, a 37-year-old artist who attended a protest in Tel Aviv on Friday calling for more discussions on the release of the hostages in response to the killings, told NPR that the incident reinforced his support for another negotiated ceasefire. “There’s no military solution to this situation,” he said. “Israel is bombing its way into a corner that it won’t be able to get out of.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.