Israel and Hamas are nearing a deal for a hostage swap and temporary pause in fighting, various sources say — but Israeli leaders are reportedly insisting that any deal allow the military to continue their assault and occupation in Gaza.
Sources from both sides as well as U.S. officials said on Monday that negotiations have reached a breakthrough point and a deal may be reached within the next few days.
Reports say that the deal would involve an exchange of captives being held in Gaza and prisoners being held by Israel; Drop Site reports, citing Palestinian sources, that 3,000 out of the roughly 10,000 Palestinian prisoners held by the Israeli military would be released in exchange for some of the 100 Israeli captives still remaining in Gaza.
President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly discussed the negotiations over the weekend as negotiators have worked to reach a deal before Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20.
U.S. and other officials have said numerous times over the past months that they are near an agreement, just for the agreement to fall apart due to Israel’s unwillingness to stop its genocide.
Media reports have described the pending deal as a ceasefire agreement. The negotiating parties are reportedly still simply negotiating over the ceasefire framework that the Biden administration introduced and that Hamas negotiators accepted in May; Palestinian journalist Muhammad Shehada has pointed out that even the list of captives set to be released is the same that was discussed in June.
But reports say that the current deal would not involve a permanent ceasefire whatsoever; rather, only a pause in fighting — and it’s questionable whether Israel would even adhere to a pause, as negotiators have insisted on keeping troops in Gaza and Israeli forces have reportedly continually violated a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon.
The New York Times reports that Netanyahu wants a “partial” deal that only allows for the release of hostages and that will allow Israel to resume fighting afterward, demanding that language be added to the deal to give Israel the ability to do so. Hamas negotiators have suggested that they will not agree to a deal that doesn’t involve a permanent ceasefire.
Even more, current hurdles to a deal include Israel’s insistence that it be able to maintain a permanent military presence in Gaza — over a land area that Israel has kept enlarging over the course of negotiations. Over the summer, Netanyahu dug his heels in on permanent military occupation of a strip of land along Gaza’s border with Egypt, as well as the Netzarim Corridor that Israel has used to split Gaza into a northern and southern region.
Now, Israel is also demanding military control over an expanded “buffer zone” along Gaza’s eastern and northern borders with Israel. Israeli negotiators have asked for a depth of 2,000 meters, or over 1.2 miles, into the small territory. “We believe this means that 60 km (37 miles) of the Gaza Strip will remain under their control, and displaced people will not return to their homes,” one Hamas negotiator told CNN.
Meanwhile, some Israeli officials are opposed to the deal. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, one of the most extremist members of Netanyahu’s government, said on Monday that the deal is a “catastrophe” because it involves the release of Palestinian prisoners — most of whom Israel holds without charges.
Smotrich openly called for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza.
“Now is the time to continue with all our might, to occupy and cleanse the entire Strip, to finally take control of humanitarian aid from Hamas, and to open the gates of hell on Gaza until Hamas surrenders completely and all the hostages are returned,” Smotrich said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.