Skip to content Skip to footer

Indiana Appeals Court Upholds Religious Exemption to Abortion Ban

The court affirmed that religious exemptions protected by Indiana law should apply to the state’s abortion ban.

Abortion rights activists gather at the Monroe County Courthouse for a protest vigil a few hours before Indiana's near total abortion ban goes into effect in Bloomington, Indiana, on September 15, 2022.

On Thursday, the Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a lower court preliminary injunction, affirming that individuals who have religious objections to the state’s abortion ban should be exempt from it.

“For many Hoosiers, the ability to obtain an abortion is necessary based on a sincerely held religious belief,” Ken Falk, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Indiana Legal Director, said in a statement. “The burden placed on these individuals by Indiana’s abortion ban is absolute and life-altering. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act is clear that it protects religious freedom for all Hoosiers, and the Court of Appeals’ decision today reflects that clear directive.”

Indiana was one of the first states in the country to ban abortion after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to the procedure in 2022. While the state was at first enjoined from implementing the law, the ban went into effect on August 30, 2023.

In 2022, the ACLU of Indiana filed a lawsuit challenging the abortion ban on behalf of five state residents and the group Hoosier Jews for Choice. The legal challenge argued that the abortion ban violated the state’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which was signed into law by conservative lawmakers in 2015. The state’s religious freedom law applies to anyone whose religious beliefs are burdened or “likely to be substantially burdened” by a law.

“The ban on abortion will substantially burden the exercise of religion by many Hoosiers who, under the new law, would be prevented from obtaining abortions, in conflict with their sincere religious beliefs,” Falk said in 2022.

The ACLU’s lawsuit argues that the state’s abortion ban violated Jewish beliefs that “a fetus attains the status of a living person only at birth” and that “Jewish law stresses the necessity of protecting the life and physical and mental health of the mother prior to birth as the fetus is not yet deemed to be a person.”

In December 2022, a state trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The state appealed the decision to the Indiana Court of Appeals, which also sided with the plaintiffs in the unanimous holding. In the majority opinion, Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Leanna Weissmann wrote that, “The religious exemption that [the women] seek, based on their sincere religious beliefs, merely expands the circumstances in which the pregnant woman’s health dictates an abortion.”

Similarly, Judge Mark Bailey wrote in a concurring opinion that:

Legislators, an overwhelming majority of whom have not experienced childbirth, nevertheless dictate that virtually all pregnancies in this state must proceed to birth notwithstanding the onerous burden upon women and girls. They have done so not based upon science or viability but upon a blanket assertion that they are the protectors of ‘life’ from the moment of conception. In my view, this is an adoption of a religious viewpoint held by some, but certainly not all, Hoosiers.

The Indiana Court of Appeals not only upheld a preliminary injunction against the state’s abortion ban for plaintiffs with sincerely held religious beliefs guiding them to terminate pregnancies, but also upheld the lower court’s decision to proceed with the lawsuit as a class action. This ruling extends the lawsuit’s coverage to all individuals whose religious convictions align with obtaining an abortion currently prohibited by state law.

“If there are women who have these religious beliefs and who need an abortion because of them, I would suggest they contact us,” Falk said. “They are members of the class that we represent, all these persons now, and they should contact us and we can determine what steps to take.”

While reproductive rights advocates celebrated the three-judge panel’s ruling, the holding does not have an immediate effect and will likely be appealed to the state Supreme Court within the next 45 days.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.