The only hospital in Sandpoint, Idaho, has announced that it will no longer be providing obstetric services for events such as childbirth due in part to Idaho’s extremely restrictive abortion bans and an increasingly hostile environment toward medical providers in the state.
The hospital, Bonner General Health, announced the decision in a press release last week, as first reported by the Idaho Statesman. The press release describes the decision as “emotional and difficult,” and specifically calls out increasing criminalization of health care providers in the state as a reason that the hospital cannot offer labor and delivery services anymore.
“Highly respected, talented physicians are leaving. Recruiting replacements will be extraordinarily difficult,” says the release. “In addition, the Idaho Legislature continues to introduce and pass bills that criminalize physicians for medical care nationally recognized as the standard of care. Consequences for Idaho physicians providing the standard of care may include civil litigation and criminal prosecution, leading to jail time or fines.”
The hospital says it will attempt to continue deliveries until mid-May and is no longer accepting new patients. Those seeking labor and delivery care in the over 9,000-person town will now have to drive 46 miles away, according to the Idaho Statesman.
“What a sad, sad state of affairs for our community,” Amelia Huntsberger, an obstetrician-gynecologist at Bonner General Health, told the Idaho Statesman. Huntsberger said that she is planning to leave the state because of its abortion laws.
The hospital also cites demographic changes of the local communities and a lack of pediatricians as a reason that it’s stopping obstetric care. “Without pediatrician coverage to manage neonatal resuscitations and prenatal care, it is unsafe and unethical to offer routine Labor and Delivery services,” the press release said.
Idaho has among the most restrictive abortion bans in the country — and, in fact, state law is so hostile toward the procedure that it has three separate bans. Its strictest anti-abortion law bans abortion from the moment of conception, with supposed exceptions for rape, incest or when the parent’s life is threatened, though those exceptions are essentially never granted in practice.
The total abortion ban allows reproductive health care providers to be convicted in criminal court for performing the procedure, and could face up to five years and prison and could have their medical licenses suspended, though this portion of the law was partially blocked after the Justice Department filed a lawsuit over the law.
Another abortion ban in the state bans the procedure after six weeks, overlapping with the total abortion ban law, while the third one allows family members of a parent who received an abortion to sue abortion providers in court.
The hospital’s announcement shows the vast effects that abortion bans can have not just on abortion care, but also reproductive care in general. Not only do abortion bans prevent physicians from being able to act ethically and provide the best standard of care for their patients, it will also make the infrastructure for reproductive care across the country even worse than it already is.
The U.S. already has by far the worst parental mortality rates of any other wealthy country — an issue that especially affects Black people. With fewer reproductive care providers — because they’ve been incarcerated, lost their licenses or stopped practicing out of fear — analysts say that the quality of reproductive care for people who can give birth will worsen in the U.S.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.