Despite several requests from the White House press corps, top administration spokesman Josh Earnest refused to ask President Obama last week if he has read a classified section of the Congressional 9/11 inquiry — one that could implicate Saudi Arabia in the attacks.
The secret text has become an issue in recent days following a “60 Minutes” report that aired this month. Former Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), the co-chair of the joint Congressional inquiry, told the CBS News magazine that the chapter reveals the 9/11-hijackers received “substantial” support from elements of Saudi society, including the government and wealthy charities.
Though Graham has made similar claims in the past and calls to release the 28-page-section in question predate the Obama White House, the “60 Minutes” segment ratcheted up pressure on the administration to reverse the report’s classification. Following the airing of the Graham interview, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-California) also called for release of the chapter, stating that “the Bush Administration’s refusal to do so was a mistake.”
The segment and the reaction led to questions from reporters every day last week at White House press briefings. Reporters want to know whether or not President Obama has even read the section. Earnest still apparently refuses to answer the question — at least publicly.
Last Monday, Earnest’s response to whether or not Obama had read the 28 pages and if he had an opinion on them was a simple, “I don’t know.”
“But we can check on that,” he added.
Come Tuesday, Earnest had yet to follow through. “I can’t tell you whether or not the President has read these 28 pages,” he told the assembled press corps once again.
“You haven’t had a chance to ask him?” one member responded.
“I have not asked him about that,” Earnest replied.
The following day, the press chief was called on to respond to a Tampa Bay Times report stating that former Sen. Graham was told by the administration that the 28 pages would be re-classified in the next two months.
“Have the President and Mr. Clapper had a conversation about this?” a reporter asked, referring to James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence. Clapper’s office (ODNI) is currently conducting a declassification review of the section.
“I’m not aware of any specific conversations between the two of them on this,” Earnest responded. He added simply that there’s hope ODNI will complete its review before the end of the President Obama term.
On Thursday, NBC reporter Ron Allen asked Earnest the exact same question that was asked on last Monday and Tuesday. After Earnest replied, again, in the negative, Allen followed up: “Do you intend to? Or is there some reason you haven’t?”
“It hasn’t been on the list of things I’ve talked to him about,” Earnest claimed, parrying the inquiry for the fourth straight day.
“So at this point we don’t know whether he’s read this, or requested it, or not,” a frustrated Allen replied.
“I’ll see if I can get some more information about it,” Earnest repeated.
During Sunday’s “60 Minutes” report, Sen. Bob Graham said that he remains “deeply disturbed by the amount of material that has been censored from this report.”
A House Resolution calling on the president to declassify portions of the report has 42 bipartisan cosponsors.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.