Skip to content Skip to footer

GOP Congressman Invokes 9/11 in Islamophobic Attack Against Ilhan Omar

Rep. Greg Murphy of North Carolina was quickly condemned for his line of attack and deleted his tweet immediately.

Rep. Ilhan Omar speaks during a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol on March 11, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

A Republican congressman is being widely criticized for using an Islamophobic attack against Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota), a Muslim congresswoman who is often attacked by the right over her religious views.

Omar tweeted on Friday about a recent incident on the U.S. Capitol grounds, in which a person rammed his vehicle into a barricade near the building and lunged at Capitol police officers with a knife. One of the responding officers died as a result, and the suspect also died, after he was shot by police on Friday.

“Heartbroken to learn another [Capitol Police Officer] was killed while protecting the Capitol,” Omar tweeted that same afternoon. “My thoughts and prayers go out to the officer’s family and the entire Capitol Police force.”

Omar also highlighted how the attack could have been different had the suspect been armed with a gun. “The death toll would have been worse if the assailant had an AR-15 instead of a knife,” she wrote.

That prompted Rep. Greg Murphy (R-North Carolina) to tweet a response of his own directed toward Omar invoking the attacks of September 11, 2001.

“Would have been worse @Ilhan if they had been flying planes into the buildings also,” Murphy wrote.

The Republican lawmaker deleted his tweet shortly after writing it, but screenshots were saved and shared afterward. Many Muslim people still face bigotry and violence because of Islamophobia that arose after the 9/11 attack, and Murphy’s attack on Omar was a continuation on that theme.

North Carolina Democratic State Sen. Jeff Jackson, who has served alongside Murphy in the state legislature, blasted the congressman for his remarks.

“You just invoked Sept. 11 to attack a Muslim member of Congress,” Jackson, who is running for a U.S. Senate seat in the state, said. “It doesn’t matter how strongly you disagree with her on policy, you should represent our state better than this, @RepGregMurphy.”

Robert S. McCaw, who serves as director of Government Affairs with The Council on American-Islamic Relations, also commented on Murphy’s tweet.

“CAIR strongly condemns Representative Murphy for invoking the September 11th terror attacks while insulting a member of Congress who is Muslim,” McCaw said in a statement. “It is disrespectful to the victims of the 9/11 attacks, to their families and to the countless Muslim and other minority hate crime victims who were targeted in the wake of 9/11. His bigoted comments only serve to perpetuate the climate of hate that we are witnessing nationwide.”

Although Murphy deleted his tweet, he has not yet commented on it or responded to the criticisms he’s received over his remarks as of Monday morning.

Murphy has made similarly bigoted statements against Democratic women in politics in the past. Last fall during the presidential race, Murphy claimed that now-Vice President Kamala Harris, was only picked by President Joe Biden to be his running mate “for her color and her race.” Harris has served as United States Senator and Attorney General for the state of California, among other roles.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.