The presence of a Confederate statue outside a courthouse in Maryland has sparked a federal lawsuit, with plaintiffs looking to have the monument removed on legal grounds after multiple attempts to get the county to voluntarily take it down failed.
Richard Potter, president of the Talbot County branch of the NAACP, first pushed for the removal of the “Talbot Boys” statue that currently resides in front of the courthouse in 2015, but the county board voted by a 5-0 vote against doing so at the time. In August 2020, two of those board members changed their minds on the matter, but a majority of the board by a 3-2 vote decided to keep the statue standing.
Officials who voted in favor of keeping the statue in last year’s vote justified doing so by faulting the limitations on getting public input on the matter during the coronavirus pandemic. Potter described the explanations given at the time as “a bunch of surface-level excuses that continue to uphold systemic racism in Talbot County.”
Now Potter and his chapter of the NAACP are being joined by Kisha Petticolas, a Black lawyer who works within the county’s public defender’s office, as well as with lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland, to sue the county in federal court to have the statue removed, alleging that the continued presence of the Confederate monument violates both state and federal law.
“That any government in the United States would continue to maintain the symbolism of white supremacy and promote a legacy of racial subjugation should shock the conscience,” their lawsuit states. “That Talbot County does so on a courthouse lawn — a place of prominence that holds itself out as the seat of justice in the county; a place that county citizens pay for and maintain with tax dollars, including the tax dollars of its Black citizens who are overtly denigrated and humiliated by the statue — only compounds the unconscionability of the statue and illuminates its illegality.”
Keeping the statue on county grounds “sends a message that the community does not value Black people, that justice is not blind, and that Black people are not equal in the eyes of the county,” the lawsuit explained. “For Black employees and litigants entering the courthouse, the statue is, in its least damaging capacity, intimidating and demoralizing.”
The Talbot Boys statue was dedicated in 1916, several decades after the end of the Civil War. It was a time during which several monuments to the Confederacy and to Confederate leaders began to appear around the country. That the period coincided with the enactment of several Jim Crow laws is proof that they were part of an attempt to promote white supremacist ideologies, many scholars and historians have pointed out.
“The statue’s origin traces directly back to the violence of Jim Crow, which followed post-Civil War Reconstruction. It was erected at a time when Confederate statues were used as a means of racial intimidation,” the lawsuit explains.
Honoring those who died on the losing side of the war, a side that Maryland was never technically a part of, is an irony that the lawsuit makes note of.
“[It’s] telling that no monument was erected to honor the sacrifices of those from Talbot County who fought for the Union — particularly since Maryland was not part of the Confederacy,” the lawsuit says.
Petticolas, during a press conference on Wednesday announcing the lawsuit, said it was “beyond time for this statue to be removed from the courthouse grounds.”
“Every day, I have to walk past that statue to get to work. It’s an unavoidable and painfully constant reminder of a time when white people fought for Black people to stay enslaved,” she added. “It is a violent, hateful legacy that white supremacists fought to preserve. How can we keep this Confederate monument erected without promoting the same legacy of white supremacy?”
Demands to remove Confederate symbols on public grounds across the country have swelled in recent years. More than 160 such symbols were removed across the U.S. in 2020 alone, with all but one being taken down after the police-perpetrated killing of George Floyd last May. Still, around 2,100 public Confederate symbols remain in the U.S., and of those, 704 are monuments.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy