The presence of a Confederate statue outside a courthouse in Maryland has sparked a federal lawsuit, with plaintiffs looking to have the monument removed on legal grounds after multiple attempts to get the county to voluntarily take it down failed.
Richard Potter, president of the Talbot County branch of the NAACP, first pushed for the removal of the “Talbot Boys” statue that currently resides in front of the courthouse in 2015, but the county board voted by a 5-0 vote against doing so at the time. In August 2020, two of those board members changed their minds on the matter, but a majority of the board by a 3-2 vote decided to keep the statue standing.
Officials who voted in favor of keeping the statue in last year’s vote justified doing so by faulting the limitations on getting public input on the matter during the coronavirus pandemic. Potter described the explanations given at the time as “a bunch of surface-level excuses that continue to uphold systemic racism in Talbot County.”
Now Potter and his chapter of the NAACP are being joined by Kisha Petticolas, a Black lawyer who works within the county’s public defender’s office, as well as with lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland, to sue the county in federal court to have the statue removed, alleging that the continued presence of the Confederate monument violates both state and federal law.
“That any government in the United States would continue to maintain the symbolism of white supremacy and promote a legacy of racial subjugation should shock the conscience,” their lawsuit states. “That Talbot County does so on a courthouse lawn — a place of prominence that holds itself out as the seat of justice in the county; a place that county citizens pay for and maintain with tax dollars, including the tax dollars of its Black citizens who are overtly denigrated and humiliated by the statue — only compounds the unconscionability of the statue and illuminates its illegality.”
Keeping the statue on county grounds “sends a message that the community does not value Black people, that justice is not blind, and that Black people are not equal in the eyes of the county,” the lawsuit explained. “For Black employees and litigants entering the courthouse, the statue is, in its least damaging capacity, intimidating and demoralizing.”
The Talbot Boys statue was dedicated in 1916, several decades after the end of the Civil War. It was a time during which several monuments to the Confederacy and to Confederate leaders began to appear around the country. That the period coincided with the enactment of several Jim Crow laws is proof that they were part of an attempt to promote white supremacist ideologies, many scholars and historians have pointed out.
“The statue’s origin traces directly back to the violence of Jim Crow, which followed post-Civil War Reconstruction. It was erected at a time when Confederate statues were used as a means of racial intimidation,” the lawsuit explains.
Honoring those who died on the losing side of the war, a side that Maryland was never technically a part of, is an irony that the lawsuit makes note of.
“[It’s] telling that no monument was erected to honor the sacrifices of those from Talbot County who fought for the Union — particularly since Maryland was not part of the Confederacy,” the lawsuit says.
Petticolas, during a press conference on Wednesday announcing the lawsuit, said it was “beyond time for this statue to be removed from the courthouse grounds.”
“Every day, I have to walk past that statue to get to work. It’s an unavoidable and painfully constant reminder of a time when white people fought for Black people to stay enslaved,” she added. “It is a violent, hateful legacy that white supremacists fought to preserve. How can we keep this Confederate monument erected without promoting the same legacy of white supremacy?”
Demands to remove Confederate symbols on public grounds across the country have swelled in recent years. More than 160 such symbols were removed across the U.S. in 2020 alone, with all but one being taken down after the police-perpetrated killing of George Floyd last May. Still, around 2,100 public Confederate symbols remain in the U.S., and of those, 704 are monuments.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.