The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision on Wednesday barring employers from requiring workers to attend meetings that are political or religious in nature — including meetings meant to quell workers’ unionization efforts.
Such gatherings, known as “captive audience” meetings, are held during workdays, and involve employers trying to coerce their employees into taking an action of some kind. Bosses typically threaten their workers with discipline or even termination if they refuse to attend.
The specific case that the NLRB examined this week dealt with an Amazon facility in New York City, which became the first of the company’s warehouses to unionize in 2022. In the days leading up to the vote for unionization, Amazon held meetings where they required workers to hear anti-union statements from paid consultants, in a failed attempt to get workers to vote against the union.
The 3-1 decision from the NLRB found that those meetings violated federal law, ruling that such meetings”have a reasonable tendency to interfere with and coerce employees in the exercise” of their rights, including in deciding whether they should form unions.
Federal law “does not license employers to compel employees, on pain of discipline or discharge, to attend meetings where they are forced to listen to the employer’s views,” the NLRB’s ruling went on.
NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran added:
Ensuring that workers can make a truly free choice about whether they want union representation is one of the fundamental goals of the National Labor Relations Act. Captive audience meetings — which give employers near-unfettered freedom to force their message about unionization on workers under threat of discipline or discharge — undermine this important goal.
The decision on Wednesday “protects workers’ freedom to make their own choices in exercising their rights,” McFerran continued, noting that employers still have the right to hold such meetings, just not to require workers to attend.
The pro-union move by the NLRB, which is an independent board appointed by presidents but working separate from them, could be completely undone in the coming months if Democrats fail to take action in the next few weeks. That’s because McFerran’s position as head of the board has not yet been confirmed by the Senate, despite the fact that the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee voted all the way back in August to advance her renomination.
If she’s not confirmed, president-elect Donald Trump would be able to nominate someone to replace her, plus one other vacancy currently on the board. Trump would also be able to replace NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo with a Republican, who would likely immediately move to have the decision on captive meetings rescinded.
Current Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York), whose position of authority in the upper chamber of Congress will expire in early January when Republicans take control, said that he and other Democrats are aiming to ensure all appointments left to be filled are voted on in the coming weeks.
“We’re going to try to do as much as we can when it comes to judges and nominees, particularly those nominees where the balance within the agency is affected,” Schumer said recently.
But some critics are skeptical, noting that focus will be given primarily to filling federal judgeships, and positions like McFerran’s may go by the wayside as a result.
It is “an indictment of the Democrats’ haphazard attention to fundamental workers’ rights that McFarren’s confirmation has dragged on to the end of the 118th Congress,” said Chris Lehmann, D.C. Bureau Chief for The Nation.
Because the Senate has been dragging its heels on McFarren’s confirmation, there’s a nontrivial chance that it will be left to die on the vine, particularly as other key posts, such as Biden’s 41 remaining nominees to the federal judiciary, are also waiting to be filled. That’s a potential miscalculation that would badly derail the cause of workers’ rights — to say nothing of the damaged electoral brand of the Democratic Party.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy