The U. S. House of Representatives failed to pass an impeachment resolution against Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Tuesday, an embarrassing outcome for Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana).
The failed vote on Tuesday evening demonstrates the incredibly thin margin of error that Johnson has to work with within his own GOP conference.
The final tally for the vote was 214 votes for impeachment versus 216 against the measure. Four Republicans joined with Democrats to oppose impeaching Mayorkas, who Republicans have accused of refusing to carry out his functions as head of DHS, specifically on policies regarding the security of the U.S.-Mexico border and immigration.
Following the failed vote, as well as the failure of Republicans to pass another standalone measure that would provide funding to aid Israel in its genocidal military campaign against Gaza, Johnson reportedly “bolted” away from the House chambers, refusing to speak with media and appearing upset with the outcome.
On Wednesday, Johnson held a press briefing in which he discussed the failed impeachment vote, claiming that Mayorkas engaged in a “dereliction of duty” and “willfully defied” federal laws, and alleging that he lied directly to Congress in testimony.
Johnson also addressed the fact that four Republicans voted against the measure, stating that he “respects the conscience of everyone and how they vote,” but that he is “convinced” that there hasn’t “ever been a cabinet secretary who was so blatantly” out of compliance with federal law.
But critics of the vote, including the Republicans who sided with Democrats against it, disputed Johnson’s characterizations.
The impeachment articles “fail to identify an impeachable crime that Mayorkas has committed,” said California Rep. Tom McClintock, one of the GOP defectors, adding that they “stretch and distort” the constitutional provisions regarding Congress’s ability to impeach officials.
Sharing a video on social media of his speech before Congress preceding the vote on impeachment, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) decried the move as a political one, suggesting that Republicans were simply going after Mayorkas because they knew they couldn’t impeach President Joe Biden for any “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
“The wild goose chase to impeach Joe Biden has located no geese, but MAGA extremists needed a consolation prize, so they tried and failed to impeach Secretary Mayorkas,” Raskin said.
Other legal minds similarly lambasted Republicans for the unnecessary and politically motivated impeachment measure.
“These are the kinds of political games House Republicans play, as if they were 6 year olds…to push a bogus, meaningless impeachment of Secretary Mayorkas,” said Lawyers for Good Government vice chair Adam Cohen.
“The failure of the vote to impeach Mayorkas is very important in its own right, but even more because a group of Republicans bucked Speaker Johnson to exercise sanity,” opined Los Angeles Times senior legal affairs columnist Harry Litman, “exactly what needs to start happening generally.”
Even though they failed to impeach Mayorkas, some Republicans are saying there may be another vote in the near future, claiming that some of the four GOP lawmakers who voted against impeachment could switch their votes and that the return of Rep. Steve Scalise, the Republican House Majority Leader who was absent for health reasons on Tuesday, could result in a different outcome.
“This is not the end of our efforts to hold Secretary Mayorkas accountable,” said Rep. Mark Green (R-Tennessee). “I look forward to Leader Scalise’s return.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.