Skip to content Skip to footer

Democrats Should Be Talking About How Republicans Have Rigged the Maps

If we don’t fix our rigged electoral system, their ideas won’t matter.

Ten Democratic presidential hopefuls participate in the third Democratic presidential debate at Texas Southern University's Health and PE Center on September 12, 2019, in Houston, Texas.

As Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren and the other leading Democratic presidential contenders prepared to debate in Houston last week, Crystal Mason readied for an important hearing of her own less than 200 miles away.

In 2016, Mason unknowingly committed a crime by casting a provisional ballot. In Texas, citizens with felony convictions are disenfranchised pending completion of their sentences. Mason, on supervised release at the time, did not know that. While her ballot was rejected, the district attorney nevertheless pursued a criminal case — and won a staggering five-year sentence, a chilling precedent for provisional ballot users. All Mason can do now is appeal the ruling.

Mason’s story — along with a botched voter purge in Texas this spring, a strict voter ID law that accepts a gun license at the polls but not a student ID, and aggressive precinct closures in minority communities — should have encouraged moderators to ask the Democratic candidates about their democracy reform agendas. This conversation could have led to a broader discussion about voter suppression, gerrymandering and the scourge of big money in politics.

Once again, there was not a single question on the subject. Democrats debated the intricacies of their health care proposals and how they’d address gun violence and immigration — none of which are actually likely to become law without first addressing the structural issues that stand in the way of passing legislation extraordinarily popular with most Americans.

There have now been three Democratic debates. They have taken place in Florida, Michigan and Texas, each of which exemplify the story of American democracy over the past decade: Republicans took power in 2010, then rigged maps and election rules to prevent Democrats from regaining power, even when they won more votes. And there still hasn’t been a single extended conversation about it.

Failing to ask about democracy not only keeps the public in the dark about the root cause of Democratic impotency over the past decade, but also gaslights the countless Americans who have stood up as part of a nonpartisan movement to democratize our political institutions.

In Michigan, for example, Republicans gerrymandered the state so well that the party held nine of 14 congressional seats after 2012, 2014 and 2016, even in years when Democratic candidates won 200,000 more votes. Democrats have also dominated the statewide vote for the state house since 2012, but have not been able to translate a majority of votes into a majority of seats during this entire decade.

In response, the nonpartisan Michigan-based group called Voters Not Politicians successfully led a statewide ballot initiative to end gerrymandering by removing the power to draw state and congressional district maps from politicians. A simultaneous grassroots effort to expand the franchise culminated in another victorious ballot initiative that included automatic and same-day voter registration.

In response, GOP officials filed a lawsuit to prevent the voter-approved independent redistricting commission from going into effect and made it more difficult to run ballot initiative campaigns in the future.

Last year in Florida, the Second Chances campaign won a ballot initiative for a state constitutional amendment that brought together liberals and conservatives with the goal of re-enfranchising those convicted of felonies who have completed the terms of their sentence, excluding murder and sexual abuse perpetators. (Ex-felons meeting those criteria in Florida — approximately 1.4 million of them at this moment — had lost voting rights permanently unless granted clemency due to a Jim Crow-era constitutional provision.)

Republican officials, immediately following this victory, approved a new law restricting enfranchisement to those who paid fines, fees and restitution — a modern-day poll tax. The state legislature, in recent years, has additionally sought to make voter registration drives harder, limit early voting on college campuses and curtail language accessibility. Right now, there is a campaign to make ballot initiatives almost impossible to win.

In Texas, partisan gerrymandering likely cost Democrats five Congressional seats in 2016, according to election expert Stephen Wolf. Equally disturbing, the state GOP has passed strict voter registration hurdles and implemented discriminatory voter ID laws, all of which primarily targeted minorities and communities of color.

The anti-democracy efforts in Michigan, Florida and Texas — supported by millions of dollars in dark money and independent expenditures — merely scratch the surface of partisan gamesmanship. In states nationwide, as voting rights are rolled back, the next wave of gerrymanders are being planned, and campaign finance regulations assailed.

Our democracy is up for grabs. We can resign ourselves to minority rule or work towards full enfranchisement and equal representation. Democracy suffers every time we fail to elevate this story. The news media, as the only profession with special constitutional protections, holds an important responsibility here. Thus far, these news organizations have not lived up to it.

The next debate will take place next month in Ohio, another state plagued with gerrymandering, voter purges and other anti-democracy endeavors. As Crystal Mason understands far too well, we fail to discuss these topics at our own peril.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.