Skip to content Skip to footer

Corker at Pompeo Hearing: We Already Endorsed Regime Change in Syria

Pompeo called for Trump to take military action in Syria.

Sen. Bob Corker speaks to reporters following a vote on Capitol Hill on January 11, 2018, in Washington, DC.

The leader of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee signaled to President Trump that the panel already approved the ouster of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) directed the comments toward Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), during the confirmation hearing for Mike Pompeo, Trump’s pick to serve as next Secretary of State.

Kaine had just completed pointed questioning of Pompeo, the current CIA Director, about whether regime change around the world should be an official US foreign policy.

Director Pompeo dodged the question, but it did prompt a response from Corker.

“It seems like everybody on this committee except Sen. [Rand] Paul of Kentucky agreed with the previous administration’s policy that Assad had to leave,” Corker said.

“Assad must go — that to me is indicative of some feeling of a regime change,” the Chairman added.

Sen. Kaine responded by claiming that current US policy toward Syria doesn’t include regime change. He described Assad as a “brutal dictator … subject to sanctions and international criminal prosecution, even military action.”

“But I don’t think the United States has a right to decide who should be the leader of another country,” Kaine said.

While Sen. Kaine is correct in noting that official stated policy from both the Obama and Trump administrations has stopped short of endorsing full regime change in Syria, it has in various forms endorsed the eventual departure of Assad.

In addition to military action already taken by the Trump administration against the Syrian government last April, the US has also since at least 2013 armed and trained rebel groups committed to the toppling of Assad.

During his testimony, Pompeo didn’t explicitly call for regime change in Syria. He did, however, argue that should President Trump take military action directly against the Assad government in response to new allegations of chemical weapons use, and that congressionally-approved authorization for military force is unnecessary.

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) described a potential targeted military strike similar to the assault ordered last April against a Syrian airbase.

“I believe that the president has the authority to do that today,” Pompeo said.

Pompeo was reminded that, as a US Congressman, he was opposed to President Obama taking military action in Libya absent a congressional authorization.

“For a long time multiple administrations have found that the president has authority to take certain actions without first coming to congress to seek approval,” Pompeo said Thursday, providing Kosovo as an example.

President Trump, meanwhile, has backed off his rhetoric suggesting a US strike against Syrian government positions are imminent.

He tweeted on Thursday, “Never said when an attack on Syria would take place. Could be very soon or not so soon at all!”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.